Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18423029›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2008

Validation of an individualised quality of life measure in older day hospital patients.

Miles D Witham, Roberta L Fulton, Lucy Wilson, Carolyn A Leslie, Marion E T McMurdo

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miles D WithamSection of Ageing and Health, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. m.witham@dundee.ac.uk
Roberta L Fulton
Lucy Wilson
Carolyn A Leslie
Marion E T McMurdo
University of Dundee · GBNinewells Hospital · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZG/2/233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo test the ease of use, reliability, responsiveness and construct validity of the Patient Generated Index, an individualised quality of life score, in older people attending a Medicine for Older People Day Hospital.

methodsProspective longitudinal study in patients attending a specialist Medicine for Older People Day Hospital in Scotland. The Patient Generated Index was administered at baseline, one week later, and at the end of Day Hospital attendance. Functional Limitations Profile, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, Barthel index and global subjective impressions of change were also collected and compared with baseline scores and change in Patient Generated Index scores. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients in subjects reporting no change in global quality of life; responsiveness was assessed using effect size and Guyatt coefficients in subjects reporting change in global quality of life. External validity was assessed via correlation with measures of physical function, comorbid disease and psychological state.

results75 patients were enrolled, mean age 81 years. Mean completion time was 5.0 minutes at baseline. Reliability was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.72) but there were weak and inconsistent responses to change (effect sizes 0.02 to 0.15; Guyatt responsiveness coefficient 0.29). Patient Generated Index scores correlated with Functional Limitation Profile scores (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), baseline anxiety score (r = -0.25, P = 0.039) and baseline depression score (r = -0.37, P = 0.002) but displayed only weak, non-significant correlation with number of comorbid diseases (r = -0.22, P = 0.07), number of medications (r = -0.21, P = 0.08) and Barthel score (r = 0.09, p = 0.45).

conclusionThe Patient Generated Index appears moderately reliable and easy to complete, but is poorly responsive to change, limiting its usefulness in clinical practice or research.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overDay Care, MedicalFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth Status IndicatorsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleReproducibility of ResultsScotland

Identifiers

PMID18423029
PMCPMC2373778
OpenAlexW2162170446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.