Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18418691›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2008

Human cerebellar responses to brush and heat stimuli in healthy and neuropathic pain subjects.

D Borsook, E A Moulton, S Tully, J D Schmahmann, L Becerra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A new vision of the role of the cerebellum in pain processing.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Re-examining the Mysterious Role of the Cerebellum in Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  14. Subcortical contributions to the sense of body ownership.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024
    Article
  15. Comparison of brain functional response to mechanical prickling stimuli to the glabrous and hairy skin.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Altered anterior insula functional connectivity in adolescent and young women with endometriosis-associated pain: Pilot resting-state fMRI study.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2022
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D BorsookPAIN Group, Brain Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA. dborsook@mclean.harvard.edu
E A Moulton
S Tully
J D Schmahmann
L Becerra

Funding

Plasticity in Human Trigeminal Somatosensory PathwaysR01NS042721 · NINDS · MC LEAN HOSPITAL (BELMONT, MA) · PI BORSOOK, DAVID · 2004 to 2008
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS NS 042721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though human pain imaging studies almost always demonstrate activation in the cerebellum, the role of the cerebellum in pain function is not well understood. Here we present results from two studies on the effects of noxious thermal heat and brush applied to the right side of the face in a group of healthy subjects (Group I) and a group of patients with neuropathic pain (Group II) who are more sensitive to both thermal and mechanical stimuli. Statistically significant activations and volumes of activations were defined in the cerebellum. Activated cerebellar structures were identified by colocalization of fMRI activation with the 'MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum'. Functional data (obtained using a 3T magnet) were defined in terms of maximum voxels and volume of activation in the cerebellum. Volume maps were then mapped onto two millimeter serial slices taken through the cerebellum in order to identify activation within regions defined by the activation volume. The data indicate that different regions of the cerebellum are involved in acute and chronic pain processing. Heat produces greater contralateral activation compared with brush, while brush resulted in more ipsilateral/bilateral cerebellar activation. Further, innocuous brush stimuli in healthy subjects produced decreased cerebellar activation in lobules concerned with somatosensory processing. The data also suggest a dichotomy of innocuous stimuli/sensorimotor cerebellum activation versus noxious experience/cognitive/limbic cerebellum activation. These results lead us to propose that the cerebellum may modulate the emotional and cognitive experience that distinguishes the perception of pain from the appreciation of innocuous sensory stimulation.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NucleiCerebellumEmotionsFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMononeuropathiesNervous System DiseasesPhysical StimulationPositron-Emission TomographyRadiographyReference Values

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.