Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18418561›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2008

[Combined transgluteal ischial and femoral nerve block: retrospective data on 65 risk patients with leg amputation].

C Raith, C Kölblinger, H Walch

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C RaithAbteilung für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, LKH Graz-West, Göstingerstrasse 22, 8020 Graz, Osterreich. christian.raith@lkh-grazwest.at
C Kölblinger
H Walch
Graz University Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For amputations of the lower limbs the combined blockade of the sciatic nerve (via the transgluteal approach) and the femoral nerve (via the inguinal route) may be a suitable alternative to general or neuroaxial anaesthetic methods. In highly comorbid, high risk patients this catheter-linked regional anaesthesia combines the advantages of avoiding controlled ventilation with decreased cardiovascular depression, as conveyed by the use of general anaesthesia or neuraxial techniques. Furthermore, improved postoperative analgesia may be achieved for several days. In our retrospective study, 65 patients who were scheduled for amputation of the lower limbs were analysed. In 58 patients (89%), a regional anaesthesia technique employing only a catheter technique was performed and only 7 patients (11%) required additional general anaesthesia. For postoperative pain management, local anaesthetics were administered via an indwelling nerve block catheter and excellent pain scores were achieved in these patients. However, successful employment of this technique necessitates sufficiently trained personnel as well as on-going training in the performance of catheter-based local analgesia.

Indexed as

Femoral NerveNerve BlockAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalCatheterizationElectric StimulationFemaleHumansAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalKetamineMidazolamPiperidinesRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID18418561
OpenAlexW1557557603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.