Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18418386›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2008

Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo.

Yun-Chi Tang, Hung-Chun Chang, Kausik Chakraborty, F Ulrich Hartl, Manajit Hayer-Hartl

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A proteome-wide map of chaperone-assisted protein refolding in a cytosol-like milieu.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Conserved and divergent chaperoning effects of Hsp60/10 chaperonins on protein folding landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Redefining Molecular Chaperones as Chaotropes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. From chaperonins to Rubisco assembly and metabolic repair.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. How do chaperonins fold protein?Biophysics (Nagoya-shi, Japan) · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Revisiting the contribution of negative charges on the chaperonin cage wall to the acceleration of protein folding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yun-Chi TangDepartment of Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Hung-Chun Chang
Kausik Chakraborty
F Ulrich Hartl
Manajit Hayer-Hartl
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GroEL/GroES chaperonin system of Escherichia coli forms a nano-cage allowing single protein molecules to fold in isolation. However, as the chaperonin can also mediate folding independently of substrate encapsulation, it remained unclear whether the folding cage is essential in vivo. To address this question, we replaced wild-type GroEL with mutants of GroEL having either a reduced cage volume or altered charge properties of the cage wall. A stepwise reduction in cage size resulted in a gradual loss of cell viability, although the mutants bound non-native protein efficiently. Strikingly, a mild reduction in cage size increased the yield and the apparent rate of green fluorescent protein folding, consistent with the view that an effect of steric confinement can accelerate folding. As shown in vitro, the observed acceleration of folding was dependent on protein encapsulation by GroES but independent of GroES cycling regulated by the GroEL ATPase. Altering the net-negative charge of the GroEL cage wall also strongly affected chaperonin function. Based on these findings, the GroEL/GroES compartment is essential for protein folding in vivo.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAdenosine TriphosphatasesChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Escherichia coliGreen Fluorescent ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Green Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18418386
PMCPMC2396394
OpenAlexW2057810278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.