Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18417556›Full record

SynthesisOccupational and environmental medicine2008

Meta-analysis of benzene exposure and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: biases could mask an important association.

C Steinmaus, A H Smith, R M Jones, M T Smith

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Benzene Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mortality Update of a Cohort of Canadian Petroleum Workers.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Gulf Long-Term Follow-Up Study (GuLF STUDY): Biospecimen collection at enrollment.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C SteinmausSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA. craigs@berkeley.edu
A H Smith
R M Jones
M T Smith
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES004705 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MORELLO-FROSCH, RACHEL ADELE · 1987 to 2025
$74.6M
Targeted Research Training CoreT42OH008429 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARRIS ADAMSON, CARISA · 2005 to 2024
$30.0M
BIOMARKERS OF BENZENE EXPOSURE AND GENOTOXICITYR01ES006721 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SMITH, MARTYN T · 1993 to 2007
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01CA104862NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004705NIEHS NIH HHS P42ES04705NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES006721NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES06721NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBenzene is a widely recognised cause of leukaemia but its association with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is less well established. The goal of this project is to review the current published literature on this association.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies of benzene exposure and NHL and a meta-analysis of NHL and refinery work, a potential source of benzene exposure.

resultsIn 22 studies of benzene exposure, the summary relative risk for NHL was 1.22 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.47; one-sided p value = 0.01). When studies that likely included unexposed subjects in the "exposed" group were excluded, the summary relative risk increased to 1.49 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.97, n = 13), and when studies based solely on self-reported work history were excluded, the relative risk rose to 2.12 (95% CI 1.11 to 4.02, n = 6). In refinery workers, the summary relative risk for NHL in all 21 studies was 1.21 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.46; p = 0.02). When adjusted for the healthy worker effect, this relative risk estimate increased to 1.42 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.69).

conclusionsThe finding of elevated relative risks in studies of both benzene exposure and refinery work provides further evidence that benzene exposure causes NHL. In addition, the finding of increased relative risks after removing studies that included unexposed or lesser exposed workers in "exposed" cohorts, and increased relative risk estimates after adjusting for the healthy worker effect, suggest that effects of benzene on NHL might be missed in occupational studies if these biases are not accounted for.

Indexed as

BenzeneBiasHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePetroleumRisk AssessmentBenzenePetroleum

Identifiers

PMID18417556
PMCPMC4353490
OpenAlexW2159199278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.