Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18417042›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2008

Diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma.

Dalbir S Sandhu, Lewis R Roberts

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dalbir S SandhuMiles and Shirley Fiterman Center for Digestive Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Lewis R Roberts
WinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a rare yet frequently fatal tumor that causes significant morbidity and mortality due to late presentation. Radiology is the mainstay of CC diagnosis; however, advances in understanding the pathogenesis of CC, including the role of oncogenes, inflammation-mediated genomic instability, and interleukin-6/STAT-3 signaling pathways, may allow development of new diagnostic and prognostic markers and targets for CC therapy. Although surgical resection is the standard of care for resectable CC, liver transplantation has shown excellent results in selected patients. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are currently limited by marginal response rates, toxicity, and biliary complications. Locally ablative therapies in the form of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radioembolization are under investigation. Molecular therapies (eg, epidermal growth factor receptor, ErbB-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antagonists) and immunotherapy using diabodies are also under investigation for treatment of unresectable CC.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaHumans

Identifiers

PMID18417042
OpenAlexW1972554829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.