ArticleBMC genomics2008
Marked variation in predicted and observed variability of tandem repeat loci across the human genome.
Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Native functions of short tandem repeats.eLife · 2023Article
- Genome-wide evaluation of the effect of short tandem repeat variation on local DNA methylation.Genome research · 2023Article
- Microsatellite Stability in STR AnalysisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019Article
- Tandem repeats mediating genetic plasticity in health and disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
- Tandem repeat variation in human and great ape populations and its impact on gene expression divergence.Genome research · 2015Article
- A survey of tandem repeat instabilities and associated gene expression changes in 35 colorectal cancers.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Genomic features of the human dopamine transporter gene and its potential epigenetic States: implications for phenotypic diversity.PloS one · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTandem repeat (TR) variants in the human genome play key roles in a number of diseases. However, current models predicting variability are based on limited training sets. We conducted a systematic analysis of TRs of unit lengths 2-12 nucleotides in Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) sequences to define the extent of variation of 209,214 unique repeat loci throughout the genome.
resultsWe applied a multivariate statistical model to predict TR variability. Predicted heterozygosity correlated with heterozygosity in the CEPH polymorphism database (correlation rho = 0.29, p < 0.0005) better than the correlation between the CEPH and WGS data (rho = 0.17), presumably because the model smoothes noise from small sample sizes. A multivariate logistic model of 8 parameters accounted for 36% of the variation in the WGS data. Validation studies of 70 experimentally investigated TRs revealed high concordance with the model's predictions (p < 0.0001).
conclusionVariability among 2-12-mer TRs in the genome can be modeled by a few parameters, which do not markedly differ according to unit length, consistent with a common mechanism for the generation of variability among such TRs. Analysis of the distributions of observed and predicted variants across the genome showed a general concordance, indicating that the repeat variation dataset does not exhibit strong regional ascertainment biases. This revealed a deficit of variant repeats in chromosomes 19 and Y - likely to reflect a reduction in 2-mer repeats in the former and a reduced level of recombination in the latter - and excesses in chromosomes 6, 13, 20 and 21.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.