Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18415711›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2008

Peritumoral retraction clefting correlates with advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Tatjana Bujas, Ivana Pavić, Tanja Lenicek, August Mijić, Bozo Kruslin, Davor Tomas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tatjana BujasDepartment of Pathology, Karlovac General Hospital, Karlovac, Andrije Stampara 3, HR-47000, Karlovac, Croatia.
Ivana Pavić
Tanja Lenicek
August Mijić
Bozo Kruslin
Davor Tomas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was designated to analyze correlation between the presence and extent of peritumoral retraction clefting and various clinicopathologic features in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and to possibly establish the significance of this phenomenon in ESCC. Fifty-four consecutive patients with advanced ESCC were included in the study. The presence of peritumoral retraction clefting was classified on the basis of the proportion of tumor nests exhibiting this phenomenon. Tumors with clefts that affected up to 25% of tumor nests were classified as group I; with clefts that affected >25% to 50% of tumor nests as group II; with clefts that affected >50% to 75% of tumor nests as group III; and tumors with clefts that affected more than 75% of tumor nests were classified as group IV. Statistical analysis showed a correlation between presence and extent of peritumoral clefting and lymph node metastasis. T3 tumors and tumors with lymph node metastasis had significantly more pronounced peritumoral clefting compared with T2 tumors and tumors without lymph node metastasis. The presence of peritumoral clefting was not associated with the number of affected lymph nodes. There was no correlation between the presence and extent of peritumoral clefting with patient age and sex, and tumor location, diameter and grade. The association of peritumoral retraction clefting in ESCC with local invasiveness and lymph node metastasis indicated that peritumoral clefting could be a simple and useful morphological feature of tumor aggressiveness and may contribute to the pathological and clinical assessment of patients with ESCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.