Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18415483›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)1995

[Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Antirheumatic, anti-pyretic or analgesic drugs?].

K Brune

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K BruneInstitut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 22, D-91054, Erlangen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript reviews some aspects of the unorthodox development of analgesics. Most of them were not discovered by systematic research for analgesics; rather they were developed primarily as antipyretic or antirheumatic drugs that later became analgesics due to clinical observations. One reason for this development may be that the definition and quantification of analgesic effects under clinical circumstances is rather difficult and a clear dose-response relationship almost impossible to obtain. These drawbacks limit the discovery of new analgesics. On the other hand, modern insights into the site of action and the mode of action of antipyretic analgesics are likely to further the discovery of new and better analgesics.

Identifiers

PMID18415483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.