Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18413606›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Protection against heterologous human papillomavirus challenge by a synthetic lipopeptide vaccine containing a broadly cross-neutralizing epitope of L2.

Hannah H Alphs, Ratish Gambhira, Balasubramanyam Karanam, Jeffrey N Roberts, Subhashini Jagu, John T Schiller, Weiguang Zeng, David C Jackson, Richard B S Roden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah H AlphsDepartments of Pathology Oncology Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231.
Ratish Gambhira
Balasubramanyam Karanam
Jeffrey N Roberts
Subhashini Jagu
John T Schiller
Weiguang Zeng
David C Jackson
Richard B S Roden
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUHarvard University · USTulane University · US

Funding

Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard Bruce Roden · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
Understanding Papillomavirus Virion Proteins and VaccinesZIABC009052 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHILLER, JOHN T. · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
Mechanisms of Papillomavirus NeutralizationR01CA118790 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, RICHARD BRUCE · 2007 to 2018
$2.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteIntramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent infection with the high-risk subset of genitotropic human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes is a necessary cause of cervical cancer. Given the global burden of cervical cancer, a low-cost, broadly protective vaccine is needed. RG-1 is a cross-neutralizing and protective monoclonal antibody that recognizes residues 17-36 of HPV16 minor capsid protein L2. Because this epitope is highly conserved in divergent HPV types, we determined whether vaccination with HPV16 L2 17-36 peptide is broadly protective. The peptide was administered to BALB/c mice three times at monthly intervals, either alone or in the context of a synthetic lipopeptide vaccine candidate (P25-P2C-HPV) produced by linkage of the HPV peptide with a broadly recognized T helper epitope (P25) and the Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR2) ligand dipalmitoyl-S-glyceryl cysteine (P2C). In contrast to vaccination with the L2 17-36 peptide or P25-P2C alone, a potent L2-specific antibody response was generated to the P25-P2C-HPV lipopeptide when delivered either s.c. or intranasally. Sera from mice vaccinated with the P25-P2C-HPV lipopeptide neutralized not only HPV16 pseudovirions but also other evolutionarily divergent oncogenic genital (HPV18, HPV45) and cutaneous (HPV5, BPV1) types. The L2-specific antibody response depended on MHC class II, CD40, and MyD88 signaling. Additionally, vaccination with the P25-P2C-HPV lipopeptide protected mice from homologous challenge with HPV16 pseudovirions at cutaneous and genital sites and heterologous challenge with HPV45 pseudovirions. If provided in the appropriate context, therefore, HPV16 L2 17-36 might be used in a totally synthetic cross-protective HPV vaccine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsChromobox Protein Homolog 5Cross ReactionsEpitopesHumansLipoproteinsMiceNeutralization TestsOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus VaccinesPeptide FragmentsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCapsid ProteinsCBX5 protein, humanChromobox Protein Homolog 5EpitopesL2 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16LipoproteinsOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus VaccinesPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID18413606
PMCPMC2299222
OpenAlexW2091001058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.