Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18413342›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2008

The Fidelity Index provides a systematic quantitation of star activity of DNA restriction endonucleases.

Hua Wei, Caitlin Therrien, Aine Blanchard, Shengxi Guan, Zhenyu Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-Darwinian Molecular Biology.Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Low-level expression of the Type II restriction-modification system confers potent bacteriophage resistance in Escherichia coli.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hua WeiNew England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA 01938, USA.
Caitlin Therrien
Aine Blanchard
Shengxi Guan
Zhenyu Zhu
Duke University · USNew England Biolabs (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restriction endonucleases are the basic tools of molecular biology. Many restriction endonucleases show relaxed sequence recognition, called star activity, as an inherent property under various digestion conditions including the optimal ones. To quantify this property we propose the concept of the Fidelity Index (FI), which is defined as the ratio of the maximum enzyme amount showing no star activity to the minimum amount needed for complete digestion at the cognate recognition site for any particular restriction endonuclease. Fidelity indices for a large number of restriction endonucleases are reported here. The effects of reaction vessel, reaction volume, incubation mode, substrate differences, reaction time, reaction temperature and additional glycerol, DMSO, ethanol and Mn(2+) on the FI are also investigated. The FI provides a practical guideline for the use of restriction endonucleases and defines a fundamental property by which restriction endonucleases can be characterized.

Indexed as

BuffersDNADNA Restriction EnzymesDNA, SuperhelicalPolymerase Chain ReactionSubstrate SpecificityTemperatureTerminology as TopicBuffersDNADNA Restriction EnzymesDNA, Superhelical

Identifiers

PMID18413342
PMCPMC2396408
OpenAlexW2001642097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.