ArticleCritical care (London, England)2008
Implementation and evaluation of the SPRINT protocol for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: a clinical practice change.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Glucose variability measures and their effect on mortality: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2011Pooled it
- Blood Glucose Levels of Subelite Athletes During 6 Days of Free Living.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2016Trial
- Severe and multiple hypoglycemic episodes are associated with increased risk of death in ICU patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Trial
- Feasibility of fully automated closed-loop glucose control using continuous subcutaneous glucose measurements in critical illness: a randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2013Trial
- LOGIC-insulin algorithm-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control during critical illness: the LOGIC-1 single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Diabetes care · 2013Trial
- Pilot study of the SPRINT glycemic control protocol in a Hungarian medical intensive care unit.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012Trial
- Second pilot trials of the STAR-Liege protocol for tight glycemic control in critically ill patients.Biomedical engineering online · 2012Trial
- Pilot study of a model-based approach to blood glucose control in very-low-birthweight neonates.BMC pediatrics · 2012Trial
- Data entry errors and design for model-based tight glycemic control in critical care.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012Trial
- Implementing glucose control in intensive care: a multicenter trial using statistical process control.Intensive care medicine · 2010Trial
- Blood glucose controller for neonatal intensive care: virtual trials development and first clinical trials.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2009Trial
- Comparison of three protocols for tight glycemic control in cardiac surgery patients.Diabetes care · 2009Trial
- Estimating Enhanced Endogenous Glucose Production in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- Review
- Blood glucose-related indicators are associated with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Estimating Increased EGP During Stress Response in Critically Ill Patients.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Insulin sensitivity in critically ill patients: are women more insulin resistant?Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- Algorithm Maxima for Intravenous Insulin Infusion.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2020Article
- Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Article
- Assessment of Glycemic Control Protocol (STAR) Through Compliance Analysis Amongst Malaysian ICU Patients.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStress-induced hyperglycaemia is prevalent in critical care. Control of blood glucose levels to within a 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L range or below 7.75 mmol/L can reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes. The Specialised Relative Insulin Nutrition Tables (SPRINT) protocol is a simple wheel-based system that modulates insulin and nutritional inputs for tight glycaemic control.
methodsSPRINT was implemented as a clinical practice change in a general intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to measure the effect of the SPRINT protocol on glycaemic control and mortality compared with previous ICU control methods. Glycaemic control and mortality outcomes for 371 SPRINT patients with a median Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 18 (interquartile range [IQR] 15 to 24) are compared with a 413-patient retrospective cohort with a median APACHE II score of 18 (IQR 15 to 23).
resultsOverall, 53.9% of all measurements were in the 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L band. Blood glucose concentrations were found to be log-normal and thus log-normal statistics are used throughout to describe the data. The average log-normal glycaemia was 6.0 mmol/L (standard deviation 1.5 mmol/L). Only 9.0% of all measurements were below 4.4 mmol/L, with 3.8% below 4 mmol/L and 0.1% of measurements below 2.2 mmol/L. On SPRINT, 80% more measurements were in the 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L band and standard deviation of blood glucose was 38% lower compared with the retrospective control. The range and peak of blood glucose were not correlated with mortality for SPRINT patients (P >0.30). For ICU length of stay (LoS) of greater than or equal to 3 days, hospital mortality was reduced from 34.1% to 25.4% (-26%) (P = 0.05). For ICU LoS of greater than or equal to 4 days, hospital mortality was reduced from 34.3% to 23.5% (-32%) (P = 0.02). For ICU LoS of greater than or equal to 5 days, hospital mortality was reduced from 31.9% to 20.6% (-35%) (P = 0.02). ICU mortality was also reduced but the P value was less than 0.13 for ICU LoS of greater than or equal to 4 and 5 days.
conclusionSPRINT achieved a high level of glycaemic control on a severely ill critical cohort population. Reductions in mortality were observed compared with a retrospective hyperglycaemic cohort. Range and peak blood glucose metrics were no longer correlated with mortality outcome under SPRINT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.