Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18410686›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary and alternative medicine2008

Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in general practice investigating the effectiveness of acupuncture against migraine.

Jorge Vas, Angel Rebollo, Emilio Perea-Milla, Camila Méndez, Carlos Ramos Font, Manuel Gómez-Río, Manuel Martín-Avila, Justo Carbrera-Iboleón, M Dolores Caballero, M Angeles Olmos and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. A review of acupoint specificity research in china: status quo and prospects.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2012
    Article
  8. Acupuncture analgesia in migraine.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jorge VasPain Treatment Unit, Primary Care Center, Dos Hermanas, Spain. jorgef.vas.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es.
Angel Rebollo
Emilio Perea-Milla
Camila Méndez
Carlos Ramos Font
Manuel Gómez-Río
Manuel Martín-Avila
Justo Carbrera-Iboleón
M Dolores Caballero
M Angeles Olmos
Inmaculada Aguilar
Vicente Faus
Francisco Martos
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESAndalusian School of Public Health · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESHospital Costa del Sol · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is a chronic neurologic disease that can severely affect the patient's quality of life. Although in recent years many randomised studies have been carried out to investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture as a treatment for migraine, it remains a controversial issue. Our aim is to determine whether acupuncture, applied under real conditions of clinical practice in the area of primary healthcare, is more effective than conventional treatment. METHODS/

designThe design consists of a pragmatic multi-centre, three-armed randomised controlled trial, complemented with an economic evaluation of the results achieved, comparing the effectiveness of verum acupuncture with sham acupuncture, and with a control group receiving normal care only. Patients eligible for inclusion will be those presenting in general practice with migraine and for whom their General Practitioner (GP) is considering referral for acupuncture. Sampling will be by consecutive selection, and by randomised allocation to the three branches of the study, in a centralised way following a 1:1:1 distribution (verum acupuncture; sham acupuncture; conventional treatment). Secondly, one patient in three will be randomly selected from each of the acupuncture (verum or sham) groups for a brain perfusion study (by single photon emission tomography). The treatment with verum acupuncture will consist of 8 treatment sessions, once a week, at points selected individually by the acupuncturist. The sham acupuncture group will receive 8 sessions, one per week, with treatment being applied at non-acupuncture points in the dorsal and lumbar regions, using the minimal puncture technique. The control group will be given conventional treatment, as will the other two groups. DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute to available evidence on acupuncture for the treatment of migraine. The primary endpoint is the difference in the number of days with migraine among the three groups, between the baseline period (the 4 weeks prior to the start of treatment) and the period from weeks 9 to 12. As a secondary aspect, we shall record the index of laterality and the percentage of change in the mean count per pixel in each region of interest measured by the brain perfusion tomography, performed on a subsample of the patients within the real and sham acupuncture groups.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN98703707.

Indexed as

Research DesignAcupuncture TherapyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMigraine DisordersPlacebo EffectPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeSpainTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18410686
PMCPMC2377233
OpenAlexW2056952964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.