Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18409073›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2008

[Drugs for postoperative analgesia: routine and new aspects: Part 2: opioids, ketamine and gabapentinoids].

J Jage, R Laufenberg-Feldmann, F Heid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Postoperative pain management in obstetrics and gynecologyJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. [Piritramide : A critical review].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J JageKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz. juergen.jage@ukmainz.de
R Laufenberg-Feldmann
F Heid
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In part 1 of this review, perioperative aspects of the use of non-opioids (acetaminophene, dipyrone, traditional NSAR, coxibs) were discussed. In part 2 the perioperative aspects of opioids (weak opioids: tramadol, tilidine with naloxone, strong opioids: morphine, piritramide, oxycodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, methadone, buprenorphine) and coanalgesics (gabapentinoids; ketamine) will now be presented. The main aim of the review is to describe the use, risks and cost of some substances to facilitate the differential indication. New aspects concerning the use of gabapentinoids and ketamine are discussed.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, PharmaceuticAminesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, DissociativeCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansKetaminePostoperative PainAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAminesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, DissociativeCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidKetamine

Identifiers

PMID18409073
OpenAlexW1539853297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.