Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18408970›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2008

Using the zebrafish lateral line to screen for ototoxicity.

Lynn L Chiu, Lisa L Cunningham, David W Raible, Edwin W Rubel, Henry C Ou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacological Approaches to Hearing Loss.Pharmacological reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Hair cell toxicology: With the help of a little fish.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Use of Zebrafish Models to Boost Research in Rare Genetic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn L ChiuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Box 356515, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Lisa L Cunningham
David W Raible
Edwin W Rubel
Henry C Ou
University of Washington · USMedical University of South Carolina · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC004661 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W, STONE, JENNIFER S. · 2000 to 2014
$11.1M
Genetics of Zebrafish Hair Cell ToxicityR01DC005987 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 2003 to 2023
$9.8M
Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC000018 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STONE, JENNIFER S. · 1989 to 2023
$7.8M
Mechanisms of Sensory Hair Cell Death and SurvivalR01DC007613 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CUNNINGHAM, LISA L · 2005 to 2010
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC0018NIDCD NIH HHS DC04661NIDCD NIH HHS DC05987NIDCD NIH HHS DC07613NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004661NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005987NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007613NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish is a valuable model for studying hair cell development, structure, genetics, and behavior. Zebrafish and other aquatic vertebrates have hair cells on their body surface organized into a sensory system called the lateral line. These hair cells are highly accessible and easily visualized using fluorescent dyes. Morphological and functional similarities to mammalian hair cells of the inner ear make the zebrafish a powerful preparation for studying hair cell toxicity. The ototoxic potential of drugs has historically been uncovered by anecdotal reports that have led to more formal investigation. Currently, no standard screen for ototoxicity exists in drug development. Thus, for the vast majority of Food and Drug Association (FDA)-approved drugs, the ototoxic potential remains unknown. In this study, we used 5-day-old zebrafish larvae to screen a library of 1,040 FDA-approved drugs and bioactives (NINDS Custom Collection II) for ototoxic effects in hair cells of the lateral line. Hair cell nuclei were selectively labeled using a fluorescent vital dye. For the initial screen, fish were exposed to drugs from the library at a 100-muM concentration for 1 h in 96-well tissue culture plates. Hair cell viability was assessed in vivo using fluorescence microscopy. One thousand forty drugs were rapidly screened for ototoxic effects. Seven known ototoxic drugs included in the library, including neomycin and cisplatin, were positively identified using these methods, as proof of concept. Fourteen compounds without previously known ototoxicity were discovered to be selectively toxic to hair cells. Dose-response curves for all 21 ototoxic compounds were determined by quantifying hair cell survival as a function of drug concentration. Dose-response relationships in the mammalian inner ear for two of the compounds without known ototoxicity, pentamidine isethionate and propantheline bromide, were then examined using in vitro preparations of the adult mouse utricle. Significant dose-dependent hair cell loss in the mouse utricle was demonstrated for both compounds. This study represents an important step in validating the use of the zebrafish lateral line as a screening tool for the identification of potentially ototoxic drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHearing DisordersLateral Line SystemMiceMice, Inbred CBAMuscarinic AntagonistsNeurons, AfferentOrgan Culture TechniquesPentamidinePropanthelineSaccule and UtricleSensitivity and SpecificityAntifungal AgentsMuscarinic AntagonistsPentamidinePropantheline

Identifiers

PMID18408970
PMCPMC2504598
OpenAlexW2102169211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.