ReviewClinical drug investigation2008
Stroke risk screening of adults with hypertension: prospective cross-sectional study in primary care.
Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the combination of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009Trial
- The Stroke Riskometer™ in the Outpatient Clinic as an Educational Campaign for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Revista de neurologia · 2025Observational
- Personalized Post-Stroke Rehabilitation in a Rural Community: A Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study on Activities of Daily Living and Disability Outcomes Using Participatory Action Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Chronic diseases in male veterans with multiple sclerosis.Preventing chronic disease · 2012Article
- Awareness of cardiovascular disease in eastern Saudi Arabia.Journal of family & community medicine · 2010Article
- Control of hypertension in eastern saudi arabia: results of screening campaign.Journal of family & community medicine · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is a lack of current epidemiological data on the risk of cerebrovascular disease associated with arterial hypertension. We therefore aimed to assess the risk factor profile of hypertensive patients in primary care in various age groups, and to calculate their corresponding risk of stroke.
methodsA total of 2482 primary-care practices throughout Germany included 47,394 consecutive unselected patients with diagnosed hypertension in a cross-sectional prospective observational study. In addition to demographic characteristics, participating primary-care physicians documented known risk factors for stroke using standardized questionnaires. The 10-year prospective risk of first stroke was then calculated according to the Framingham Stroke Risk Score.
main outcome measuresPatients were evenly balanced for sex (females 51%), and the mean age was 66.5 years. Mean systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP) blood pressure was 147/86 mmHg. Only 29.1% of patients had an SBP <140 mmHg, and 60.2% had a DBP <90 mmHg. The most prevalent risk factors were a positive family history of cardiovascular disease (46.1%), diabetes mellitus (36.1%), coronary artery disease (34.4%), and left ventricular hypertrophy (33.3%). Drug treatment was given as combination therapy in 73.5% of the total cohort of patients. The mean 10-year risk of stroke was 26% in the total cohort (0-19% in 50.6% of patients, 20-49% in 32.7%, and > or =50% in 16.7%).
conclusionsCo-morbidities relevant for total stroke risk are very prevalent among typical primary-care patients, confirming a substantial burden of disease in this setting. The resulting risk of stroke is substantial. The need for more aggressive BP control and treatment of modifiable risk factors is confirmed by our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.