Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18404288›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2008

Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Takatoshi Nakamura, Hiroyuki Mitomi, Atsushi Ihara, Wataru Onozato, Takeo Sato, Heita Ozawa, Kazuhiko Hatade, Masahiko Watanabe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk Factors for Wound Infection After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer.Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takatoshi NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan. n-toshi@kitasato-u.ac.jp
Hiroyuki Mitomi
Atsushi Ihara
Wataru Onozato
Takeo Sato
Heita Ozawa
Kazuhiko Hatade
Masahiko Watanabe
Kitasato University · JPNational Sagamihara Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong complications after surgery for colorectal cancer, wound infections may prolong hospitalization and increase healthcare costs. This study was designed to clarify the incidence, risk factors, and pathogens responsible for wound infections after surgery for colorectal cancer.

methodsThe study group comprised 144 patients (94 men and 50 women) with colorectal cancer in whom the same surgeon at Kitasato University Hospital performed resection from January 2004 through December 2005. Their mean age was 67.1 years (range = 38-90). To identify risk factors for surgical wound infections, we examined the following 11 variables: gender, age (>65 vs. <or=65 years), body-mass index (>25 vs. <or=25 kg/m(2)), the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, physical status according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA score), stage of cancer according to the TNM staging system, surgical procedure (laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy), procedure type (right colectomy vs. left colectomy vs. anterior resection), operation time (>180 vs. <or=180 min), intraoperative bleeding volume (>120 vs. <or=120 ml), and the presence or absence of intraoperative transfusion. Tissue specimens of infected wounds were cultured to identify pathogens.

resultsPostoperative wound infections occurred in 12% (17/144) of the patients. In univariate analyses, the incidence of wound infection was 26% (11/43) in patients who underwent open colectomy compared with 6% (6/101) in those who underwent laparoscopic colectomy. This difference was significant (P = 0.001). In multivariate analyses, only surgical procedure was identified as an independent risk factor for wound infection. The odds ratio for open colectomy compared with laparoscopic colectomy was 3.322 (P = 0.021). Pus from infected wounds was cultured in 7 of the 17 patients and cultures were positive for pathogens in 5 patients: 1 laparoscopic colectomy and 4 open colectomy. Bacteroides species were the most common pathogen.

conclusionTo prevent wound infections after surgery for colorectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery should be performed when indicated.

Indexed as

AgedColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansIncidenceLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID18404288
OpenAlexW1993321802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.