Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18404264›Full record

ReviewEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2008

Push-me-pull-you: how microtubules organize the cell interior.

Iva M Tolić-Nørrelykke

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tension at intercellular junctions is necessary for accurate orientation of cell division in the epithelium plane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Intracellular infection by symbiotic bacteria requires the mitotic kinase AURORA1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Spindle reorientation in response to mechanical stress is an emergent property of the spindle positioning mechanisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Contribution of cytoplasm viscoelastic properties to mitotic spindle positioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Anaphase B: Long-standing models meet new concepts.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Materials for blood brain barrier modelingMaterials science & engineering. R, Reports : a review journal · 2020
    Article
  18. Cytoskeleton Force Exertion in Bulk Cytoplasm.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iva M Tolić-NørrelykkeMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307, Dresden, Germany. tolic@mpi-cbg.de
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic organization of the cell interior, which is crucial for cell function, largely depends on the microtubule cytoskeleton. Microtubules move and position organelles by pushing, pulling, or sliding. Pushing forces can be generated by microtubule polymerization, whereas pulling typically involves microtubule depolymerization or molecular motors, or both. Sliding between a microtubule and another microtubule, an organelle, or the cell cortex is also powered by molecular motors. Although numerous examples of microtubule-based pushing and pulling in living cells have been observed, it is not clear why different cell types and processes employ different mechanisms. This review introduces a classification of microtubule-based positioning strategies and discusses the efficacy of pushing and pulling. The positioning mechanisms based on microtubule pushing are efficient for movements over small distances, and for centering of organelles in symmetric geometries. Mechanisms based on pulling, on the other hand, are typically more elaborate, but are necessary when the distances to be covered by the organelles are large, and when the geometry is asymmetric and complex. Thus, taking into account cell geometry and the length scale of the movements helps to identify general principles of the intracellular layout based on microtubule forces.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaCellsMicrotubulesOrganelles

Identifiers

PMID18404264
PMCPMC2518947
OpenAlexW2084134747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.