ReviewIntensive & critical care nursing2008
Oral care and the risk of bloodstream infections in mechanically ventilated adults: A review.
Review in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Prediction of Secondary Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Cerebral Infarction: A Nomogram-Driven Risk Assessment Model Based on LASSO Regression.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Candida albicans induces mucosal bacterial dysbiosis that promotes invasive infection.PLoS pathogens · 2019Article
- Evidence to support tooth brushing in critically ill patients.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2011Review
- Oral care and bacteremia risk in mechanically ventilated adults.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleBacteraemia, defined as the presence of viable bacteria in the circulating blood can result in bloodstream infection, which is one of the most frequent and challenging hospital-acquired infections. Bacteraemia occurs in healthy populations with manipulation of the oral mucosa, including toothbrushing. Oral care is commonly administered to mechanically ventilated patients, it is important to determine whether this practice contributes to the incidence of bacteraemia. This paper reviews the literature on the link between the manipulation of the oral cavity and the development of bacteraemia in mechanically ventilated adults.
methodsSearches were conducted using Medline, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library databases. Article inclusion criteria were (1) a focus on mechanical ventilation and critical illness, (2) human subjects, (3) adult subjects, and (4) publication in English (or available English translation).
resultsNine articles met inclusion criteria and were critiqued. All relied upon clinical data as outcome measures; many were retrospective. The three organisms most often associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase negative staphylococci, and Enterococcus species. Establishing the origin of bacteraemia was problematic in most studies.
conclusionsAdditional research is needed to understand the relationship of oral care practices to bacteraemia in mechanically ventilated adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.