ArticleThe Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology2008
What are comparative studies telling us about the mechanism of ERbeta action in the ERE-dependent E2 signaling pathway?
Article in The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estrogen Receptor Function: Impact on the Human Endometrium.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Absolute Quantification of Phosphorylated ERβ Amino Acids in the Hippocampus of Women and in A Rat Model of Menopause.Endocrinology · 2021Article
- Molecular mechanism of estrogen-estrogen receptor signaling.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2017Review
- Estrogen receptors similarly mediate the effects of 17β-estradiol on cellular responses but differ in their potencies.Endocrine · 2011Article
- Do Estrogen Receptor beta Polymorphisms Play A Role in the Pharmacogenetics of Estrogen Signaling?Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Estrogen hormone (E2) signaling is primarily conveyed by the estrogen receptors (ER) alpha and beta. ERs are encoded by two distinct genes and share varying degrees of domain-specific structural/functional similarities. ERs mediate a complex array of nuclear and non-nuclear events critical for the homeodynamic regulation of various tissue functions. The canonical nuclear signaling involves the interaction of ERalpha and ERbeta with specific DNA sequences, the so-called estrogen responsive elements (EREs). This interaction constitutes the initial step in ERE-dependent signaling in which ERbeta is a weaker transcription factor than ERalpha in response to E2. However, it remains unclear why transactivation potencies of ER subtypes differ. Studies suggest that the amino-terminus, the least conserved structural region, of ERbeta, but not that of ERalpha, impairs the ability of the receptor to bind to ERE independent of E2. Although the impaired ERbeta-ERE interaction contributes, it is not sufficient to explain the weak transactivation potency of the receptor. It appears that the lack of transactivation ability and of the capability of the amino-terminus of ERbeta, as opposed to that of ERalpha, to functionally interact with the carboxyl-terminal hormone-dependent activation domain is also critical for the receptor-specific activity. Thus, the structurally distinct amino-termini of ERs are important determinants in defining the function of ER-subtypes in the ERE-dependent pathway. This could differentially affect the physiology and pathophysiology of E2 signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.