ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Gene identification and protein classification in microbial metagenomic sequence data via incremental clustering.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Peptide-based functional annotation of carbohydrate-active enzymes by conserved unique peptide patterns (CUPP).Biotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
- Environmental genes and genomes: understanding the differences and challenges in the approaches and software for their analyses.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2015Article
- The Road to Metagenomics: From Microbiology to DNA Sequencing Technologies and Bioinformatics.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- Article
- The Pacific Ocean virome (POV): a marine viral metagenomic dataset and associated protein clusters for quantitative viral ecology.PloS one · 2013Article
- CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Bioinformatic approaches for functional annotation and pathway inference in metagenomics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Review
- Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Article
- FragGeneScan: predicting genes in short and error-prone reads.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- The JCVI standard operating procedure for annotating prokaryotic metagenomic shotgun sequencing data.Standards in genomic sciences · 2010Article
- Missing genes in the annotation of prokaryotic genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- A primer on metagenomics.PLoS computational biology · 2010Review
- Functional viral metagenomics and the next generation of molecular tools.Trends in microbiology · 2010Review
- Signal processing for metagenomics: extracting information from the soup.Current genomics · 2009Article
- Analysis and comparison of very large metagenomes with fast clustering and functional annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Orphelia: predicting genes in metagenomic sequencing reads.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe identification and study of proteins from metagenomic datasets can shed light on the roles and interactions of the source organisms in their communities. However, metagenomic datasets are characterized by the presence of organisms with varying GC composition, codon usage biases etc., and consequently gene identification is challenging. The vast amount of sequence data also requires faster protein family classification tools.
resultsWe present a computational improvement to a sequence clustering approach that we developed previously to identify and classify protein coding genes in large microbial metagenomic datasets. The clustering approach can be used to identify protein coding genes in prokaryotes, viruses, and intron-less eukaryotes. The computational improvement is based on an incremental clustering method that does not require the expensive all-against-all compute that was required by the original approach, while still preserving the remote homology detection capabilities. We present evaluations of the clustering approach in protein-coding gene identification and classification, and also present the results of updating the protein clusters from our previous work with recent genomic and metagenomic sequences. The clustering results are available via CAMERA, (http://camera.calit2.net).
conclusionThe clustering paradigm is shown to be a very useful tool in the analysis of microbial metagenomic data. The incremental clustering method is shown to be much faster than the original approach in identifying genes, grouping sequences into existing protein families, and also identifying novel families that have multiple members in a metagenomic dataset. These clusters provide a basis for further studies of protein families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.