Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18402641›Full record

ReviewNeurogastroenterology and motility2008

Regulation of smooth muscle excitation and contraction.

K M Sanders

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacological insights intoFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Orai storeoperated CaChannels (Austin, Tex.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

K M SandersDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV 89557, USA. ksanders@medicine.nevada.edu
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Tissue, Cell and Tissue Culture CoreP01DK041315 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WARD, SEAN M · 1989 to 2018
$26.3M
Electrical Control of Gastric MotilityR37DK040569 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI SANDERS, KENTON M · 2004 to 2013
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK041315NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK41315NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK040569NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK40569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smooth muscle cells (SMC) make up the muscular portion of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from the distal oesophagus to the internal anal sphincter. Coordinated contractions of these cells produce the motor patterns of GI motility. Considerable progress was made during the last 20 years to understand the basic mechanisms controlling excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling. The smooth muscle motor is now understood in great molecular detail, and much has been learned about the mechanisms that deliver and recover Ca2+ during contractions. The majority of Ca2+ that initiates contractions comes from the external solution and is supplied by voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCC). VDCC are regulated largely by the effects of K+ and non-selective cation conductances (NSCC) on cell membrane potential and excitability. Ca2+ entry is supplemented by release of Ca2+ from IP(3) receptor-operated stores and by mechanisms that alter the sensitivity of the contractile apparatus to changes in cytoplasmic Ca2+. Molecular studies of the regulation of smooth muscle have been complicated by the plasticity of SMC and difficulties in culturing these cells without dramatic phenotypic changes. Major questions remain to be resolved regarding the details of E-C coupling in human GI smooth muscles. New discoveries regarding molecular expression that give GI smooth muscle their unique properties, the phenotypic changes that occur in SMC in GI motor disorders, tissue engineering approaches to repair or replace defective muscular regions, and molecular manipulations of GI smooth muscles in animals models and in cell culture will be topics for exciting investigations in the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsGastrointestinal TractHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle RelaxationMuscle, Smooth

Identifiers

PMID18402641
PMCPMC8320329
OpenAlexW1595865504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.