ArticleObesity surgery2008
What is the quality of information about bariatric surgery on the internet?
Article in Obesity surgery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality Assessment of Information on Bariatric Surgery Websites.Obesity surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Online patient education resources in bariatric surgery: a systematic evaluation of quality, readability, transparency, and representation.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Online Search Trends Related to Bariatric Surgery and Their Relationship with Utilization in Australia.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Large language models and bariatric surgery patient education: a comparative readability analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and online institutional resources.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Discussion of Weight Loss Surgery in Instagram Posts: Successive Sampling Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2021Article
- Readability of online patient-based information on bariatric surgery.Health promotion perspectives · 2019Article
- Response to "Older Cancer Patients' User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study".Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Article
- THE USE OF THE INTERNET BY THE PATIENT AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: CONTRIBUTIONS AND OBSTACLES FOR THE FOLLOW-UP OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY MONITORING.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2015Article
- The impact of socioeconomic factors on patient preparation for bariatric surgery.Obesity surgery · 2009Article
- Philip Morris's health information web site appears responsible but undermines public health.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of Internet on patients scheduled for bariatric procedures and the quality of information available on different websites.
methodsBetween July 2003 to July 2005, patients undergoing bariatric surgical procedures completed a survey. Data were collected prospectively. One hundred valid surveys were returned. Independently, two bariatric surgeons evaluated available French and English websites using major search engines.
resultsForty-two of 100 patients (42%) sought information about bariatric surgery on the Internet. Seventy-four percent of these patients (n = 31/42) used search engines with 81% visiting less than ten websites. According to the patient's evaluation, 58% of the websites visited did not provide technical details of any surgical bariatric procedures, and only 61% provided information regarding postoperative weight loss. Furthermore, 58% of websites did not provide information about the laparoscopic approach, and 54% did not give any information on potential postoperative complications. Bariatric surgeon's evaluation was similar except for two differences: laparoscopic approach and postoperative weight loss information were discussed in 90% (p < 0.001) and 43% (p < 0.1) of visited websites, respectively.
conclusionWhen the Internet was used to search for information about bariatric surgery, search engines were preferentially used but search duration was short. Available Internet websites can be considered as moderately reliable; however, 25% of visited websites contain misleading information. Comparison between patients and surgeons views showed that patients were effective in detecting misleading information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18401669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.