Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18401669›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2008

What is the quality of information about bariatric surgery on the internet?

B Makar, D Quilliot, R Zarnegar, T Levan, A Ayav, L Bresler, P Boissel, L Brunaud

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. THE USE OF THE INTERNET BY THE PATIENT AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: CONTRIBUTIONS AND OBSTACLES FOR THE FOLLOW-UP OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY MONITORING.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B MakarDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery, University of Nancy, CHU Nancy Brabois (Hopital adultes), 11 allee du morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France. makar.bassem@orange.fr
D Quilliot
R Zarnegar
T Levan
A Ayav
L Bresler
P Boissel
L Brunaud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of Internet on patients scheduled for bariatric procedures and the quality of information available on different websites.

methodsBetween July 2003 to July 2005, patients undergoing bariatric surgical procedures completed a survey. Data were collected prospectively. One hundred valid surveys were returned. Independently, two bariatric surgeons evaluated available French and English websites using major search engines.

resultsForty-two of 100 patients (42%) sought information about bariatric surgery on the Internet. Seventy-four percent of these patients (n = 31/42) used search engines with 81% visiting less than ten websites. According to the patient's evaluation, 58% of the websites visited did not provide technical details of any surgical bariatric procedures, and only 61% provided information regarding postoperative weight loss. Furthermore, 58% of websites did not provide information about the laparoscopic approach, and 54% did not give any information on potential postoperative complications. Bariatric surgeon's evaluation was similar except for two differences: laparoscopic approach and postoperative weight loss information were discussed in 90% (p < 0.001) and 43% (p < 0.1) of visited websites, respectively.

conclusionWhen the Internet was used to search for information about bariatric surgery, search engines were preferentially used but search duration was short. Available Internet websites can be considered as moderately reliable; however, 25% of visited websites contain misleading information. Comparison between patients and surgeons views showed that patients were effective in detecting misleading information.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryInternetHumansInformation DisseminationInformation Services

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.