Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18401572›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2008

[Acute ischemic stroke. Diagnostic imaging and interventional options].

J Trenkler

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J TrenklerInstitut für Radiologie, Oö. Landes-Nervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg, Linz, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15, A-4020, Linz, Osterreich. johannes.trenkler@gespag.at

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the third most common cause of death after myocardial infarction and neoplasms in industrialized countries and the most common cause for permanent disability with impairment of an independent life style. In addition to the socioeconomic problems caused by a disabling stroke, it is to be expected that with an increasing average age of the population, the number of stroke patients will increase as well [4]. The need for effective and widely available therapies against this severe disease is highly evident. Diagnostic imaging is indispensable in order to apply these therapies efficiently and precisely. In addition to the established intravenous thrombolytic therapy with rt-PA within the first 3 h, a therapeutic benefit can also be achieved with thrombolysis inside the time-window 3-6 h, whereas the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages increases. Local intraarterial fibrinolysis (LIF) within 6 h is effective and safe and may lead to considerable improvement despite an initially severe medical condition [13]. Besides LIF, interventional techniques for mechanical recanalization of intracranial vessel occlusions are becoming increasingly more established. According to international guidelines for the treatment of acute stroke, computed tomography (CT) is considered to be the most important technical diagnostic tool if available round-the-clock. Alternatively, magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) may primarily be performed if carried out without delay and if the imaging protocol contains a sequence suitable for exclusion of hemorrhages.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCerebral AngiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingThrombolytic TherapyTomography, X-Ray ComputedVascular Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.