Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18401436›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2008

Adeno-associated virus integration: virus versus vector.

R H Smith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. tRNA therapeutics for genetic diseases.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Gene therapy for the heart: encapsulated viruses to the rescue.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Binding and neutralizing anti-AAV antibodies: Detection and implications for rAAV-mediated gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R H SmithLaboratory of Biochemical Genetics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. smithr@nhlbi.nih.gov

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a large percentage of the world population is seropositive for exposure to various strains of adeno-associated virus (AAV), a human parvovirus, AAV has never been identified as an etiologic agent of human disease. Most likely contributing to the pronounced lack of pathogenicity is the fact that AAV is a naturally defective virus that requires a helper virus for productive replication of its genome. Another unusual aspect of wild-type AAV biology is the ability of the virus to establish latent infection by preferential integration of its genome into a specific locus of human chromosome 19. Site-specific integration was a major impetus for the development of recombinant AAV vectors, which typically lack all AAV coding sequences. It was soon realized, however, that expression of at least one species of the virally encoded initiator proteins, Rep78 or Rep68, is necessary for targeted integration of AAV-derived DNA constructs to occur. This article will present a chronological outline of studies characterizing site-specific integration of wild-type AAV sequences and the quasi-random target site selection observed with recombinant AAV vectors.

Indexed as

DependovirusGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGenome, ViralHumansMutagenesis, Site-DirectedTransduction, GeneticVirus IntegrationVirus Latency

Identifiers

PMID18401436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.