Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18401224›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2008

The use of olmesartan medoxomil as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents in elderly hypertensive patients in Japan.

Ikuo Saito, Toshio Kushiro, Koji Hirata, Yuki Sato, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Kei Sagawa, Katsutoshi Hiramatsu, Masahiro Komiya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Rationale, study design, baseline characteristics and blood pressure at 16 weeks in the HONEST Study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2013
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ikuo SaitoHealth Center, Keio University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan. saito@hc.cc.keio.ac.jp
Toshio Kushiro
Koji Hirata
Yuki Sato
Fumiaki Kobayashi
Kei Sagawa
Katsutoshi Hiramatsu
Masahiro Komiya
Daiichi-Sankyo (Japan) · JPKeio University · JPNihon University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) was assessed in 550 elderly Japanese hypertensive patients who were followed for 24 weeks in daily clinical practice. Patients were given OLM alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs at the discretion of the investigators. After 24 weeks of treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) significantly decreased from baseline (P<.0001). When patients were classified as either young-old (65-74 years) or older-old (75 years and older), with either isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) or systolic-diastolic hypertension (SDH), the reduction of diastolic BP in ISH patients was significantly smaller than that in SDH patients (5.0 vs 15.2 mm Hg; P<.0001), indicating that OLM did not cause excessive reduction of diastolic BP in ISH patients. Treatment was well tolerated in all groups. In conclusion, the medication was safe and effective in reducing BP levels in ISH patients aged 75 years and older, as well as in other elderly hypertensive patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionImidazolesJapanMaleOlmesartan MedoxomilProspective StudiesTetrazolesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsImidazolesOlmesartan MedoxomilTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID18401224
PMCPMC8109950
OpenAlexW2076262570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.