Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18400811›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2009

Secondary effects of antipsychotics: women at greater risk than men.

Mary V Seeman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Women with Schizophrenia: Beyond Psychosis.Community mental health journal · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary V SeemanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto. mary.seeman@utoronto.ca
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe health burden of antipsychotic medication is well known, but the disproportionate effect on women as compared with men is underappreciated.

objectiveThe goal of this article is preventive--to better inform clinicians so that the risks to women and to their offspring can be diminished.

methodAll PubMed sources in which the search term gender (or sex) was linked to a side effect of antipsychotic medication were reviewed.

resultThere is general agreement in the literature on women's increased susceptibility to weight gain, diabetes, and specific cardiovascular risks of antipsychotics, with less consensus on malignancy risks and risks to the fetus. Cardiovascular death, to which men are more susceptible than women, is disproportionately increased in women by the use of antipsychotics. Sedating antipsychotics raise the risk of embolic phenomena during pregnancy, and postpartum. Prolactin-elevating drugs suppress gonadal hormone secretion and may enhance autoimmune proclivity.

conclusionsClinicians need to be aware of the differential harm that women (and their offspring) can incur from the side effects of antipsychotics.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAntipsychotic AgentsAutoimmune DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHematologic DiseasesHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeoplasmsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPuerperal DisordersRisk AssessmentAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18400811
PMCPMC2728808
OpenAlexW2157736783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.