Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18400147›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2008

Detection and prevalence patterns of group I coronaviruses in bats, northern Germany.

Florian Gloza-Rausch, Anne Ipsen, Antje Seebens, Matthias Göttsche, Marcus Panning, Jan Felix Drexler, Nadine Petersen, Augustina Annan, Klaus Grywna, Marcel Müller and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Presence ofViruses · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. First Report ofViruses · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Florian Gloza-RauschCentre for Bat Protection and Information, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Anne Ipsen
Antje Seebens
Matthias Göttsche
Marcus Panning
Jan Felix Drexler
Nadine Petersen
Augustina Annan
Klaus Grywna
Marcel Müller
Susanne Pfefferle
Christian Drosten

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested 315 bats from 7 different bat species in northern Germany for coronaviruses by reverse transcription-PCR. The overall prevalence was 9.8%. There were 4 lineages of group I coronaviruses in association with 4 different species of verspertilionid bats (Myotis dasycneme, M. daubentonii, Pipistrellus nathusii, P. pygmaeus). The lineages formed a monophyletic clade of bat coronaviruses found in northern Germany. The clade of bat coronaviruses have a sister relationship with a clade of Chinese type I coronaviruses that were also associated with the Myotis genus (M. ricketti). Young age and ongoing lactation, but not sex or existing gravidity, correlated significantly with coronavirus detection. The virus is probably maintained on the population level by amplification and transmission in maternity colonies, rather than being maintained in individual bats.

Indexed as

AnimalsChiropteraCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsFemaleGermanyMalePhylogenyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID18400147
PMCPMC2570906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.