Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18400046›Full record

ArticleBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2008

Anti-O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma multiforme: observer variability and lack of association with patient survival impede its use as clinical biomarker.

Matthias Preusser, Robert Charles Janzer, Jörg Felsberg, Guido Reifenberger, Marie-France Hamou, Annie-Claire Diserens, Roger Stupp, Thierry Gorlia, Christine Marosi, Harald Heinzl and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 240 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Role of non-coding RNAs in OOncology letters · 2026
    Review
  11. [The biomarker MGMT (OPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: From Pathology to Treatment.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthias PreusserDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, Medial University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Robert Charles Janzer
Jörg Felsberg
Guido Reifenberger
Marie-France Hamou
Annie-Claire Diserens
Roger Stupp
Thierry Gorlia
Christine Marosi
Harald Heinzl
Johannes A Hainfellner
Monika Hegi
University of Lausanne · CHHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silencing of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein expression because of MGMT gene promoter hypermethylation is considered to be associated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy benefits in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The objective of this study was to clarify the usability of MGMT immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a clinical biomarker. We immunostained a tissue microarray containing biopsy samples of 164 GBM patients from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Cancer Institute of Canada (EORTC/NCIC) trial 26981/22981 using two commercial anti-MGMT antibodies (clones MT3.1 and MT23.2). Immunostaining results were semiquantitatively evaluated by four observers from three neuropathological laboratories using a predefined algorithm. We analyzed (i) inter- and intraobserver agreement on MGMT expression (kappa statistics); (ii) correlation of MGMT expression with MGMT promoter methylation status (kappa statistics); and (iii) correlation of MGMT expression with patient outcome (log-rank test). Interobserver agreement on MGMT expression varied from slight to almost perfect, whereas intraobserver agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect. MGMT expression showed poor to moderate correlation with MGMT promoter methylation status. We found no significant association of MGMT expression with patient outcome. In our hands, observer variability as well as lack of association with the MGMT promoter methylation status and patient survival impeded the use of anti-MGMT immunohistochemistry as a clinical biomarker for routine diagnostic purposes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodiesAntibody SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGlioblastomaHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedObserver VariationAntibodiesBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18400046
PMCPMC8095504
OpenAlexW2137868544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.