ReviewBlood2008
Stem-cell ecology and stem cells in motion.
Review in Blood, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organ Crosstalk: The Role of Spleen.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Bone marrow niches for hematopoietic stem cells.HemaSphere · 2024Review
- Beyond brain injury biomarkers: chemoattractants and circulating progenitor cells as biomarkers of endogenous rehabilitation effort in preterm neonates with encephalopathy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Understanding the "SMART" features of hematopoietic stem cells and beyond.Science China. Life sciences · 2021Review
- Review
- Orthogonal targeting of osteoclasts and myeloma cells for radionuclide stimulated dynamic therapy induces multidimensional cell death pathways.Theranostics · 2021Article
- A Review of the Action of Magnesium on Several Processes Involved in the Modulation of Hematopoiesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Case Report: Concomitant Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Leukemia in Patient With JAK2 Positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasm.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Regulation of Genomic Output and (Pluri)potency in Regeneration.Annual review of genetics · 2019Review
- Unveiling Mesenchymal Stromal Cells' Organizing Function in Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Long Non-coding RNAs in Myeloid Malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Nanotherapeutics for multiple myeloma.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2018Review
- Re-programming immunosurveillance in persistent non-infectious ocular inflammation.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2018Review
- The bone-marrow niche in MDS and MGUS: implications for AML and MM.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018Review
- Geographic clonal tracking in macaques provides insights into HSPC migration and differentiation.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2018Article
- Adhesion Assay for Murine Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem Cells.Bio-protocol · 2017Article
- Aerobic exercise in humans mobilizes HSCs in an intensity-dependent manner.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2017Article
- The hematopoietic system in the context of regenerative medicine.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2016Review
- Regulation of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells by EPCR/PAR1 signaling.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016Review
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review highlights major scientific developments over the past 50 years or so in concepts related to stem-cell ecology and to stem cells in motion. Many thorough and eloquent reviews have been presented in the last 5 years updating progress in these issues. Some paradigms have been challenged, others validated, or new ones brought to light. In the present review, we will confine our remarks to the historical development of progress. In doing so, we will refrain from a detailed analysis of controversial data, emphasizing instead widely accepted views and some challenging novel ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.