Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18395675›Full record

ReviewGender medicine2008

Estrogens and the diabetic kidney.

Christine Maric, Shannon Sullivan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gender medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of Sex Hormones in Prevalent Kidney Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of sex hormones in diabetic nephropathy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Renal function decline in older men and women with advanced chronic kidney disease-results from the EQUAL study.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine MaricDepartment of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA. cm255@georgetown.edu
Shannon Sullivan
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

ESTROGEN AND INFLAMMATION IN DIABETIC NEPHROPATHYR01DK075832 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI MARIC-BILKAN, CHRISTINE · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK075832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcross all ages, the incidence and rate of progression of most nondiabetic renal diseases are markedly higher in men compared with age-matched women. These observations suggest that female sex may be renoprotective. In the setting of diabetes, however, this female protection against the development and progression of renal disease is diminished.

objectiveThis review aimed to summarize our current understanding of sex differences in the development and progression of diabetic renal disease, and of the contribution of sex hormones, particularly estrogens, to the pathophysiology of this disease. We also attempted to answer why female sex does not protect the diabetic kidney.

methodsUsing terms such as gender, sex, diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, estrogens, and sex hormones, the PubMed database was searched for English-language articles; targeted searches were conducted using terms such as gender/sex differences in diabetic renal disease. No restrictions were imposed on publication dates.

resultsAlthough the existing data regarding the sex differences in the incidence and progression of diabetic renal disease are inconclusive, the undisputed fact is that women with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibit a much higher incidence of renal disease compared with nondiabetic women. It is conceivable that the loss of female sex as a renoprotective factor in diabetes may be related to the abnormal regulation of sex hormone concentrations. Both clinical and experimental data suggest that diabetes may be associated with an imbalance in estradiol concentrations. Supplementation with 17beta-estradiol or administration of selective estrogen receptor modulators reduces the incidence of diabetes and attenuates the progression of diabetic renal disease.

conclusionsSerum concentrations of ovarian hormones may provide a new means for predicting future risk of renal complications in diabetes. Exogenous steroid hormones may be an effective treatment for attenuating the progression of diabetic nephropathy.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesDisease ProgressionEstrogensFemaleHumansIncidenceInsulin ResistanceKidneyMaleMenopausePostmenopauseSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsSex FactorsEstrogensSelective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID18395675
PMCPMC3178838
OpenAlexW2072858219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.