Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18395478›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2008

Implications of a poroelastic cytoplasm for the dynamics of animal cell shape.

T J Mitchison, G T Charras, L Mahadevan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Physical Forces in Regeneration of Cells and Tissues.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neutrophils actively swell to potentiate rapid migration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. [Latest Findings on Phase Separation of Cytomechanical Proteins].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Two-fluid dynamics and micron-thin boundary layers shape cytoplasmic flows in earlyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hydrostatic pressure as a driver of cell and tissue morphogenesis.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Morphogenetic Roles of Hydrostatic Pressure in Animal Development.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Contribution of cytoplasm viscoelastic properties to mitotic spindle positioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

T J MitchisonDepartment Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. tim_mitchison@hms.harvard.edu
G T Charras
L Mahadevan
Center for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF CYTOKINESISR01GM023928 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J · 1985 to 2010
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM023928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two views have dominated recent discussions of the physical basis of cell shape change during migration and division of animal cells: the cytoplasm can be modeled as a viscoelastic continuum, and the forces that change its shape are generated only by actin polymerization and actomyosin contractility in the cell cortex. Here, we question both views: we suggest that the cytoplasm is better described as poroelastic, and that hydrodynamic forces may be generally important for its shape dynamics. In the poroelastic view, the cytoplasm consists of a porous, elastic solid (cytoskeleton, organelles, ribosomes) penetrated by an interstitial fluid (cytosol) that moves through the pores in response to pressure gradients. If the pore size is small (30-60nm), as has been observed in some cells, pressure does not globally equilibrate on time and length scales relevant to cell motility. Pressure differences across the plasma membrane drive blebbing, and potentially other type of protrusive motility. In the poroelastic view, these pressures can be higher in one part of a cell than another, and can thus cause local shape change. Local pressure transients could be generated by actomyosin contractility, or by local activation of osmogenic ion transporters in the plasma membrane. We propose that local activation of Na(+)/H(+) antiporters (NHE1) at the front of migrating cells promotes local swelling there to help drive protrusive motility, acting in combination with actin polymerization. Local shrinking at the equator of dividing cells may similarly help drive invagination during cytokinesis, acting in combination with actomyosin contractility. Testing these hypotheses is not easy, as water is a difficult analyte to track, and will require a joint effort of the cytoskeleton and ion physiology communities.

Indexed as

Cell ShapeAnimalsCell MovementCytoplasmElasticityOsmosisViscosity

Identifiers

PMID18395478
PMCPMC2696638
OpenAlexW2093016898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.