Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18395030›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2008

Early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer: shifting from early stage to minimal volume of disease based on a new model of carcinogenesis.

Robert J Kurman, Kala Visvanathan, Richard Roden, T C Wu, Ie-Ming Shih

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Ovarian cancer stem cells and targeted therapy.Journal of ovarian research · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J KurmanDepartment of Pathology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kala Visvanathan
Richard Roden
T C Wu
Ie-Ming Shih
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Molecular Diagnostics for Malignant EffusionR01CA103937 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHIH, IE-MING · 2004 to 2012
$2.7M
The Roles of HBXAP Gene in Ovarian CancerR01CA129080 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHIH, IE-MING · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Pathogenesis of Ovarian Serous Borderline TumorsR01CA116184 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KURMAN, ROBERT J. · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA103937NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116184NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of ovarian cancer screening is to detect disease when confined to the ovary (stage I) and thereby prolong survival. We believe this is an elusive goal because most ovarian cancer, at its earliest recognizable stage, is probably not confined to the ovary. We propose a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis based on clinical, pathological, and molecular genetic studies that may enable more targeted screening and therapeutic intervention to be developed. The model divides ovarian cancer into 2 groups designated type I and type II. Type I tumors are slow growing, generally confined to the ovary at diagnosis and develop from well-established precursor lesions so-called borderline tumors. Type I tumors include low-grade micropapillary serous carcinoma, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinomas. They are genetically stable and are characterized by mutations in a number of different genes including KRAS, BRAF, PTEN, and beta-catenin. Type II tumors are rapidly growing, highly aggressive neoplasms that lack well-defined precursor lesions; most are advanced stage at, or soon after, their inception. These include high-grade serous carcinoma, malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (carcinosarcomas), and undifferentiated carcinomas. The type II tumors are characterized by mutation of TP53 and a high level of genetic instability. Screening tests that focus on stage I disease may detect low-grade type I neoplasms but miss the more aggressive type II tumors, which account for most ovarian cancers. A more rational approach to early detection of ovarian cancer should focus on low volume rather than low stage of disease.

Indexed as

beta CateninCA-125 AntigenFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMutationNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PTEN Phosphohydrolaseras ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53beta CateninBRAF protein, humanCA-125 AntigenKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanras ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID18395030
PMCPMC2532696
OpenAlexW2023414851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.