Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2008
Assessment of immunologic response and recurrence patterns among patients with clinical recurrence after vaccination with a preventive HER2/neu peptide vaccine: from US Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study I-01 and I-02.
Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase Ib Trial of HER2/Neu Peptide (E75) Vaccine in Breast Cancer Patients at Risk for Recurrence After Surgical and Medical Therapies
Phase Ib Trial of HER2/Neu Peptide (E75) Vaccine in Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients
PRESENT: Prevention of Recurrence in Early-Stage, Node-Positive Breast Cancer With Low to Intermediate HER2 Expressions With NeuVax™Treatment
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Potential association factors for developing effective peptide-based cancer vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- GM-CSF: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Application of HER2 peptide vaccines in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer cell international · 2021Review
- Evaluating Nelipepimut-S in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Short Report on the Emerging Data.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2020Review
- Progressive loss of anti-HER2 CD4Oncoimmunology · 2015Article
- Recent advances in the development of breast cancer vaccines.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2014Review
- Breast cancer immunobiology driving immunotherapy: vaccines and immune checkpoint blockade.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2012Review
- The ubiquitin-like protein, ISG15, is a novel tumor-associated antigen for cancer immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2012Article
- PDEF and PDEF-induced proteins as candidate tumor antigens for T cell and antibody-mediated immunotherapy of breast cancer.Immunologic research · 2010Review
- The E75 HER2/neu peptide vaccine.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundE75, a HER2/neu immunogenic peptide, is expressed in breast cancer (BCa). We have performed clinical trials of E75 + GM-CSF vaccine in disease-free, node-positive and node-negative BCa patients at high recurrence risk and recurrences were noted in both control and vaccine groups.
methodsAmong the 186 BCa patients enrolled, 177 completed the study. Patients were HLA typed; the HLA-A2(+)/A3(+) patients were vaccinated; HLA-A2(-)/A3(-) patients were followed as controls. Standard clinicopathological factors, immunologic response to the vaccine, and recurrences were collected and assessed.
resultsThe control group recurrence rate was 14.8 and 8.3% in the vaccinated group (P = 0.17). Comparing the 8 vaccinated recurrences (V-R) to the 88 vaccinated nonrecurrent patients (V-NR), the V-R group had higher nodal stage (> or = N2: 75 vs. 5%, P = 0.0001) and higher grade tumors (%grade 3: 88 vs. 31%, P = 0.003). The V-R group did not fail to respond immunologically as noted by equivalent dimer responses and post-DTH responses. Compared to control recurrent patients (C-R), V-R patients trended toward higher-grade tumors and hormone-receptor negativity. C-R patients had 50% bone-only recurrences, compared to V-R patients with no bone-only recurrences (P = 0.05). Lastly, V-R mortality rate was 12.5% compared with 41.7% for the C-R group (P = 0.3).
conclusionsThe vaccinated patients who recurred had more aggressive disease compared to V-NR patients. V-R patients had no difference in immune response to the vaccine either in vitro or in vivo. V-R patients, when compared to C-R patients, trended towards more aggressive disease, decreased recurrence rates, decreased mortality, and no bone-only recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.