Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18391977›Full record

ReviewOncogene2008

Forkhead transcription factors and ageing.

L Partridge, J C Brüning

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Naturally Occurring Variability in the Regulatory Region of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. FOXO-mediated repression of Dicer1 regulates metabolism, stress resistance, and longevity inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Transcriptome ofInsects · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dietary restriction: could it be considered as speed bump on tumor progression road?Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Aging and brain rejuvenation as systemic events.Journal of neurochemistry · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L PartridgeInstitute of Healthy Ageing, GEE, London, UK. l.partridge@ucl.ac.uk
J C Brüning
MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in single genes and environmental interventions can extend healthy lifespan in laboratory model organisms. Some of the mechanisms involved show evolutionary conservation, opening the way to using simpler invertebrates to understand human ageing. Forkhead transcription factors have been found to play a key role in lifespan extension by alterations in the insulin/IGF pathway and by dietary restriction. Interventions that extend lifespan have also been found to delay or ameliorate the impact of ageing-related pathology and disease, including cancer. Understanding the mode of action of forkheads in this context will illuminate the mechanisms by which ageing acts as a risk factor for ageing-related disease, and could lead to the development of a broad-spectrum, preventative medicine for the diseases of ageing.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansForkhead Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18391977
OpenAlexW2070403076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.