Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18390391›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2008

Warburg revisited: imaging tumour blood flow and metabolism.

K A Miles, R E Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic brain-to-liver [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Quantitative Total-Body Imaging of Blood Flow with High-Temporal-Resolution Early DynamicJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. MRI evaluation of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMROJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. EJNMMI research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Beyond T2 and 3T: New MRI techniques for clinicians.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K A MilesBrighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK. k.a.miles@bsms.ac.uk
R E Williams
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 1930s, Otto Warburg reported that anaerobic metabolism of glucose is a fundamental property of all tumours, even in the presence of an adequate oxygen supply. He also demonstrated a relationship between the degree of anaerobic metabolism and tumour growth rate. Today, this phenomenon forms the basis of tumour imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). More recently, Folkman has demonstrated that malignant growth and survival are also dependent on tumour vascularity which is increasingly evaluated in vivo using techniques such as contrast enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although it is reasonable to hypothesise that the metabolic requirements of tumours are mirrored by alterations in tumour haemodynamics, the relationship between tumour blood flow and metabolism is in fact complex. A well-developed tumour vascular supply is required to ensure a sufficient delivery of glucose and oxygen to support the metabolism essential for tumour growth. However, an inadequate vascularisation of tumour will result in hypoxia, a factor that is known to stimulate anaerobic metabolism of glucose. Thus, the balance between tumour blood flow and metabolism will be an important indicator of the biological status of a tumour and hence the tumour's likely progression and response to treatment. This article reviews the molecular biology of tumour vascularisation and metabolism, relating these processes to currently available imaging techniques while summarising the imaging studies that have compared tumour blood flow and metabolism. The potential for vascular metabolic imaging to assess tumour aggression and sub-classify treatment response is highlighted.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBlood Flow VelocityDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ImagingHumansSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID18390391
PMCPMC2324371
OpenAlexW1979750265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.