ArticleSurgical endoscopy2009
Cytokine responses following laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty in children.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database.World journal of urology · 2015Article
- An updated meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Postoperative Inflammatory Response and Recovery following Pediatric Pyeloplasty: A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study evaluated the cytokine response in children following laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) or open pyeloplasty (OP). A series of cytokines were measured postoperatively, including interkin1-beta (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
methodsA total of 31 patients, with an average age of 9.1 +/- 3.0 years (range 2.5-14 years) were studied. Fourteen patients underwent LP and 17 underwent OP. Blood serum concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-alpha, and CRP were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before surgery as well as 4, 24, and 48 h following the operation. In addition, the procedure duration, hospital stay, incidence of wound infection, and the recurrence rate of stenosis in both groups were compared.
resultsSerum IL-6 and CRP concentrations were significantly elevated in both groups at 4, 24, and 48 h relative to preoperative levels. However, the rise in IL-6 and CRP in OP group was significantly more robust than in LP group. No significant changes were observed in serum levels of IL-1beta, IL-8, IL-10, or TNF-alpha in either group. The procedure duration was significantly longer for LP (193.6 +/- 74.7 min, range 120-360 min) versus OP (120.1 +/- 27.5 min, range 90-165 min, p < 0.05), but the hospital stay following LP was shorter (LP group: 5.3 +/- 1.1 days versus OP group: 9.3 +/- 2.1 days, p < 0.05). No severe complications were noted in either group, however, one child experienced wound infection following OP procedure. An incident of recurrent stenosis following the operation occurred in both groups. There was no postoperative morbidity or severe implications at 12 month follow-up in either group.
conclusionsBoth OP and LP are safe and effective procedures for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the pediatric population. However, the shorter hospital stay and decreased cytokine response following LP indicates potential benefits over traditional invasive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.