Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18389300›Full record

ReviewHNO2008

[Analgesic intolerance (AI). Key position of ENT physicians for early detection of this condition].

U Förster, H Olze

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

U FörsterKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin. ul.foerster@web.de
H Olze

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical manifestation of analgesic intolerance (AI) is frequently associated with symptoms examined by ear-nose-throat (ENT) specialists. The prevalence of AI is reported in the literature to be 0.6-2.5%. Even though there are no concluding results concerning its pathogenesis, an altered arachidonic acid metabolism is most likely the underlying pathomechanism. The symptoms include chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, gastrointestinal ulcers, angioedema, and urticaria. Clinical reactions after ingestion of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory-drugs (NSAIDs) are often obvious in the progress of disease. In order to initiate early therapy and therefore prevent the progress of disease, the diagnosis of AI should occur before the complete picture of AI is obvious. Adaptive desensitization is currently the single causal therapy. Frequency of endonasal revision surgery is reduced after desensitization; severe asthma and reactions after ingestion of NSAIDs are avoided. ENT specialists are particularly in a key position for early detection of AI.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDrug HypersensitivityGermanyHumansOtolaryngologyOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.