Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18389221›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2008

Computer-assisted glucose control in critically ill patients.

Mathijs Vogelzang, Bert G Loef, Joost G Regtien, Iwan C C van der Horst, Hein van Assen, Felix Zijlstra, Maarten W N Nijsten

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01085071 (GRIP-COMPASS Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01085071 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

GRIP-COMPASS Trial: Computer-driven Glucose and Potassium Regulation Program in Intensive Care Patients With COMparison of PotASSium Targets Within normokAlemic Range

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2009 to 2012Enrolled1,225ConditionsThoracic Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Critically IllArmsPotassium Chloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. [Glucose control in the critically ill. Innovations and contemporary strategies].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of insulin therapy and glucose normalisation in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mathijs VogelzangDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.vogelzang@thorax.umcg.nl
Bert G Loef
Joost G Regtien
Iwan C C van der Horst
Hein van Assen
Felix Zijlstra
Maarten W N Nijsten

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntensive insulin therapy is associated with the risk of hypoglycemia and increased costs of material and personnel. We therefore evaluated the safety and efficiency of a computer-assisted glucose control protocol in a large population of critically ill patients. DESIGN AND

settingObservational cohort study in three intensive care units (32 beds) in a 1,300-bed university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All 2,800 patients admitted to the surgical, neurosurgical, and cardiothoracic units; the study period started at each ICU after implementation of Glucose Regulation for Intensive Care Patients (GRIP), a freely available computer-assisted glucose control protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsWe analysed compliance in relation to recommended insulin pump rates and glucose measurement frequency. Patients were on GRIP-ordered pump rates 97% of time. Median measurement time was 5min late (IQR 20min early to 34 min late). Hypoglycemia was uncommon (7% of patients for mild hypoglycemia, < 3.5mmol/l; 0.86% for severe hypoglycemia, < 2.2 mmol/l). Our predefined target range (4.0-7.5 mmol/l) was reached after a median of 5.6 h (IQR 0.2-11.8) and maintained for 89% (70-100%) of the remaining stay at the ICU. The number of measurements needed was 5.9 (4.8-7.3) per patient per day. In-hospital mortality was 10.1%.

conclusionsOur computer-assisted glucose control protocol provides safe and efficient glucose regulation in routine intensive care practice. A low rate of hypoglycemic episodes was achieved with a considerably lower number of glucose measurements than used in most other schemes.

Indexed as

Insulin Infusion SystemsAgedBlood GlucoseCritical CareDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID18389221
PMCPMC2491417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.