Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18387229›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2008

Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework.

Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf, Daniel Munday, Nigel King, Jeremy Dale

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Overlap Between Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care: A Scoping Literature Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. GPs' decisions about prescribing end-of-life anticipatory medications: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Improving palliative care provision in primary care: a pre- and post-survey evaluation among PaTz groups.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Multidisciplinary team meetings in primary care: could they help to attract the GPs of tomorrow?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of end-of-life care for older people living at home and in residential homes: a mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kashifa Mahmood-YousufHealth Services Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Daniel Munday
Nigel King
Jeremy Dale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh quality end-of-life care in the community is achieved with effective multidisciplinary teamwork, interprofessional communication between GPs and district nurses, and early referral of patients to district nurses. These aspects of palliative care are highlighted in the Gold Standards Framework, a programme recently established in UK primary care.

aimTo investigate the extent to which the framework influences interprofessional relationships and communication, and to compare GPs' and nurses' experiences. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative interview case study.

settingFifteen participating practices from three primary care trusts in England.

methodThirty-eight semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs, district nurses, Macmillan nurses, and framework facilitators.

resultsAdoption of the framework often resulted in earlier referral of palliative care patients to district nurses. Multidisciplinary team meetings enabled communication for sharing knowledge, discussing management problems, and keeping colleagues informed; however, arranging and maintaining such meetings was often problematic. Nurses particularly valued formal meetings while GPs generally preferred informal ad hoc dialogue. GPs largely maintained control of the mode of multidisciplinary working. The best functioning teams used a mixture of formal and informal meetings with a relatively non-hierarchical working style.

conclusionImplementing the framework enabled processes of communication associated with high quality palliative care in general practice, but there was marked variation in how this worked in individual teams. In general, hierarchical doctor-nurse relationships persisted.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamily PracticeInterprofessional RelationsCommunicationCommunity Health NursingContinuity of Patient CareCooperative BehaviorEnglandHumansPatient Care ManagementPhysician-Nurse RelationsQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID18387229
PMCPMC2277111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.