Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18387184›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2008

Effects of intensive home visiting programs for older people with poor health status: a systematic review.

Ans Bouman, Erik van Rossum, Patricia Nelemans, Gertrudis Ijm Kempen, Paul Knipschild

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02664454 (Compared Efficacy of Nurse-led and GP-led Geriatric Assessment in PrImary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02664454 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Compared Efficacy of Nurse-led and GP-led Geriatric Assessment in PrImary Care: A Pragmatic Three-arm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2016 to 2018Enrolled750ConditionsMultimorbidity, Geriatric AssessmentArmshealth care organization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Cost analysis of a home-based nurse care coordination program.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2014
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ans BoumanDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Peter Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands. Ans.Nicolaides@EPID.unimaas.nl
Erik van Rossum
Patricia Nelemans
Gertrudis Ijm Kempen
Paul Knipschild

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome visiting programs have been developed aimed at improving the health and independent functioning of older people. Also, they intend to reduce hospital and nursing home admission and associated cost. A substantial number of studies have examined the effects of preventive home visiting programs on older people living in the community; the findings have been inconsistent. The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of intensive home visiting programs targeting older people with poor health or otherwise with functional impairments.

methodsA search for literature was based on included trials from four reviews on the effectiveness of home visits published after 2000 and on a database search of Cinahl, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline and PsycINFO from 2001 onwards. We also manually searched reference lists from potentially relevant papers. Randomized controlled trials were included assessing the effectiveness of intervention programs consisting of at least four home visits per year, an intervention duration of 12 months or more, and targeting older people (aged 65 years and over) with poor health. Two reviewers independently abstracted data from full papers on program characteristics and outcome measures; they also evaluated the methodological quality.

resultsThe search identified 844 abstracts; eight papers met the inclusion criteria. Seven trials were of sufficient methodological quality; none of the trials showed a significant favorable effect for the main analysis comparing the intervention group with the control group on mortality, health status, service use or cost. The inclusion of less-intensive intervention programs for frail older persons would not have exerted a great influence on the findings of our review.

conclusionWe conclude that home visiting programs appear not to be beneficial for older people with poor health within the health care setting of Western countries.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedHome Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth PromotionHealth StatusHouse CallsHumansMalePatient SelectionProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID18387184
PMCPMC2364620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.