Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18386134›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2008

Characterisation of breast cancer cell lines and establishment of a novel isogenic subclone to study migration, invasion and tumourigenicity.

Linda Hughes, Catherine Malone, Saranya Chumsri, Angelika M Burger, Susan McDonnell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda HughesUCD School of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Catherine Malone
Saranya Chumsri
Angelika M Burger
Susan McDonnell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of tumour invasion and subsequent metastasis represents the most lethal aspect of cancer. In this study the invasive and migratory activity of four human breast cancer cell lines; MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, BT474 and Hs578T was investigated. Isogenic subclones were isolated from the Hs578T cell line using sequential passages through the BD Matrigel Invasion Chamber assay system. A new invasive subclone designated, Hs578Ts(i)8 was isolated and shown to be 3-fold more invasive and 2.5-fold more migratory than the parental cell line. The variant cells formed up to 25 times more colonies in soft agar and also produced tumours in vivo in nude mice. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the Hs578Ts(i)8 cells had 30% more CD44+/CD24-/low cells than the parental Hs578T cell line. The presence of a breast cancer stem cell population within the variant cell line may provide an explanation for the increased anchorage independent growth and tumourigenicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MovementFemaleFlow CytometryHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm InvasivenessStem CellsCD24 AntigenHyaluronan Receptors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.