Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18386100›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2008

A systematic review of teamwork training interventions in medical student and resident education.

Chayan Chakraborti, Romsai T Boonyasai, Scott M Wright, David E Kern

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Experiences from leading parental education groups: Perceived difficulties and rewards as an indication of skill acquisition.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. To lead or to influence?Canadian medical education journal · 2021
    Article
  19. A Mapping Review of Teamwork Training and Assessment in Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chayan ChakrabortiDivision of Hospital Medicine, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC 20037, USA. cchakra@gmail.com
Romsai T Boonyasai
Scott M Wright
David E Kern
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center · USGeorge Washington University Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN HEART &VASCULAR DISEASET32HL007180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARUTHUR, NISA M · 1985 to 2020
$11.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007180NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL07180PHS HHS 5-T-32-HP10025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeamwork is important for improving care across transitions between providers and for increasing patient safety.

objectiveThis review's objective was to assess the characteristics and efficacy of published curricula designed to teach teamwork to medical students and house staff.

designThe authors searched MEDLINE, Education Resources Information Center, Excerpta Medica Database, PsychInfo, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus for original data articles published in English between January 1980 and July 2006 that reported descriptions of teamwork training and evaluation results. MEASUREMENTS: Two reviewers independently abstracted information about curricular content (using Baker's framework of teamwork competencies), educational methods, evaluation design, outcomes measured, and results.

resultsThirteen studies met inclusion criteria. All curricula employed active learning methods; the majority (77%) included multidisciplinary training. Ten curricula (77%) used an uncontrolled pre/post design and 3 (23%) used controlled pre/post designs. Only 3 curricula (23%) reported outcomes beyond end of program, and only 1 (8%) >6 weeks after program completion. One program evaluated a clinical outcome (patient satisfaction), which was unchanged after the intervention. The median effect size was 0.40 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.29, 0.61) for knowledge, 0.38 (IQR 0.32, 0.41) for attitudes, 0.41 (IQR 0.35, 0.49) for skills and behavior. The relationship between the number of teamwork principles taught and effect size achieved a Spearman's correlation of .74 (p = .01) for overall effect size and .64 (p = .03) for median skills/behaviors effect size.

conclusionsReported curricula employ some sound educational principles and appear to be modestly effective in the short term. Curricula may be more effective when they address more teamwork principles.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansProfessional Competence

Identifiers

PMID18386100
PMCPMC2517885
OpenAlexW1965591513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.