Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18385799›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2008

Multiplex bead analysis of vitreous and serum concentrations of inflammatory and proangiogenic factors in diabetic patients.

Richard Maier, Martin Weger, Eva-Maria Haller-Schober, Yosuf El-Shabrawi, Andreas Wedrich, Anna Theisl, Reingard Aigner, Alfred Barth, Anton Haas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard MaierDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. richardmaier@chello.at
Martin Weger
Eva-Maria Haller-Schober
Yosuf El-Shabrawi
Andreas Wedrich
Anna Theisl
Reingard Aigner
Alfred Barth
Anton Haas
Medical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the role of inflammatory and angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy, we determined, in diabetic patients and controls, vitreous and serum concentrations of interferon-induced protein (IP)-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, regulated upon activation, normal T-expressed and secreted (RANTES), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

methodsWe recruited 36 probands with type 2 diabetes mellitus (15 noninsulin-dependent and 21 insulin-dependent) and 69 normal controls. Using Cytometric Bead Array Technology, we measured vitreous and serum concentrations of IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, RANTES, and VEGF.

resultsIn diabetic patients the mean vitreous levels of IP-10, MCP-1 and VEGF were significantly higher compared normal controls. [IP-10 (pg/mL) 254.84 +/-311.67 versus 78.90 +/- 67.94 (p<0.001); MCP-1 (pg/mL) 1127.14 +/- 738.91 versus 700.80 +/-419.21 (p=0.002); VEGF (pg/mL) 954.98 +/- 2315.09 versus 37.90 +/- 28.51(p<0.001)]. Vitreous levels of VEGF correlated with vitreous levels of both IP-10 and MCP-1 (p<0.05). MIP-1beta, RANTES, and VEGF mean serum levels were significantly raised in diabetic probands while IP-10, MCP-1, and MIP-1alpha serum levels showed no significant elevation compared to controls [IP-10 (pg/mL) 346.20 +/- 287.36 versus 328.74 +/-352.35 (p=0.88); MCP-1(pg/mL) 133.10 +/- 89.10 versus 141.47 +/- 222.15 (p=0.50); MIP-1beta (pg/mL) 184.40 +/- 100.20 versus 139.56 +/- 151.38 (p=0.003); RANTES (pg/mL) 51336.23 +/- 19940.31 versus 33629.2 +/- 33301.0 (p=0.002); VEGF (pg/mL) 304.88 +/- 257.52 versus 154.45 +/- 114.78 (p<0.001)].

conclusionsOur results suggest that in diabetics, there is an upregulation of IP-10, MCP-1, and VEGF in the vitreous and an upregulation of MIP-1beta, RANTES, and VEGF in the serum. These findings support the concept of an angiogenic and inflammatory element in the development of diabetic retinopathy.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsChemokine CCL2Chemokine CCL4Chemokine CCL5Chemokine CXCL10Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansInflammation MediatorsMaleMiddle AgedOsmolar ConcentrationUp-RegulationAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsCCL2 protein, humanChemokine CCL2Chemokine CCL4Chemokine CCL5Chemokine CXCL10CXCL10 protein, humanInflammation MediatorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID18385799
PMCPMC2276180
OpenAlexW2147973575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.