ArticleNature2008
Genomics: when the smoke clears ...
Article in Nature, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelling morbidity for neglected tropical diseases: the long and winding road from cumulative exposure to long-term pathology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Rare coding variants in CHRNB2 reduce the likelihood of smoking.Nature genetics · 2023Article
- Somatic mutational profiles and germline polygenic risk scores in human cancer.Genome medicine · 2022Article
- Landscape on CT screening for lung cancer in Asia.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Review
- Runs of homozygosity associate with decreased risks of lung cancer in never-smoking East Asian females.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- CERAMIC: Case-Control Association Testing in Samples with Related Individuals, Based on Retrospective Mixed Model Analysis with Adjustment for Covariates.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Retrospective Binary-Trait Association Test Elucidates Genetic Architecture of Crohn Disease.American journal of human genetics · 2016Article
- Interactions between household air pollution and GWAS-identified lung cancer susceptibility markers in the Female Lung Cancer Consortium in Asia (FLCCA).Human genetics · 2015Article
- Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013Review
- Genetic variations in TERT-CLPTM1L genes and risk of lung cancer in Chinese women nonsmokers.PloS one · 2013Article
- Genome-wide association analysis identifies new lung cancer susceptibility loci in never-smoking women in Asia.Nature genetics · 2012Article
- Causation and causal inference for genetic effects.Human genetics · 2012Review
- Gene-environment interaction testing in family-based association studies with phenotypically ascertained samples: a causal inference approach.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Nicotine dependence and comorbid psychiatric disorders: examination of specific genetic variants in the CHRNA5-A3-B4 nicotinic receptor genes.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2012Article
- Genetic variants on 15q25.1, smoking, and lung cancer: an assessment of mediation and interaction.American journal of epidemiology · 2012Article
- Informed conditioning on clinical covariates increases power in case-control association studies.PLoS genetics · 2012Article
- Gene-based partial least-squares approaches for detecting rare variant associations with complex traits.BMC proceedings · 2011Article
- Genetic architecture of cancer and other complex diseases: lessons learned and future directions.Carcinogenesis · 2011Review
- Current status of genome-wide association studies in cancer.Human genetics · 2011Review
- A complete graphical criterion for the adjustment formula in mediation analysis.The international journal of biostatistics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18385720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.