ArticleHistochemistry1991
Rat muscle spindle immunocytochemistry revisited.
Article in Histochemistry, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-expression of MyHC-15 with other known isoforms in rat muscle spindles.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2025Article
- Fibre typing of intrafusal fibres.Journal of anatomy · 2015Review
- Do palisade endings in extraocular muscles arise from neurons in the motor nuclei?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2011Article
- Expression of Myosin heavy chain isoforms in rat soleus muscle spindles after 19 days of hypergravity.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2003Article
- Neomyogenesis in neonatally de-efferented and postnatally denervated rat muscle spindles.Acta neuropathologica · 1995Article
- Sequences of intrafusal fiber formation are muscle-dependent in rat hindlimbs.Anatomy and embryology · 1994Article
- Transient expression of a slow-tonic MHC isoform by extrafusal fibers in the developing rat.Anatomy and embryology · 1993Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms in muscle spindle fibres has been the subject of a number of immunocytochemical studies, some of them with discordant results. In order to assess whether these discrepancies are due to differences in the specificity and sensitivity of the antibodies used, we have compared the reactivity of rat muscle spindle fibres to two pairs of antibodies presumed to be directed against slow tonic (ALD 19 and ALD 58) and neonatal (NN5) and neonatal/fast (MF30) myosin heavy chains. Adult, developing and neonatally de-efferented muscle spindles from the rat hind limb muscles were studied in serial cross-sections processed for the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. Important differences in the staining profiles of intrafusal fibres were noted when ALD 19 and ALD 58 were compared. ALD 19 stained the muscle spindle precursors from the seventeenth day in utero, whereas ALD 58 only did so by the twentieth day of gestation. In adult spindles ALD 19 stained the nuclear bag1 fibres along their entire length, whereas ALD 58 did not stain these fibres towards their ends. ALD 19 stained the nuclear bag2 fibres along the A, B and inner C region, but ALD 58 stained these fibres only in the A and the inner B regions. ALD 19 stained some nuclear chain fibres along a short equatorial segment, whereas ALD 58 did not stain the nuclear chain fibres at all. NN5 stained the nascent nuclear bag1 and chain fibre precursors at earlier stages of development than MF30. Clear differential staining between primary and secondary generation of both extra- and intrafusal myotubes was seen with NN5, whereas MF30 stained all myotubes alike. However, in postnatal spindles, MF30 was a very good negative marker of nuclear bag1 fibres. The staining profile of the adult fibres with NN5 and MF30 was rather similar. The staining pattern of neonatally de-efferented bag fibres obtained with ALD 19 and ALD 58 was practically identical and it differed from that of control spindles, confirming that motor innervation participates in the regulation of the expression of slow tonic MHC along the length of the nuclear bag2 fibres, as we have previously shown with ALD 19. The distinct staining patterns obtained with ALD 19 versus ALD 58 and with NN5 versus MF30 reflect differences in antibody sensitivity and specificity. These differences account, in part, for the discrepancies in the results of previous studies on muscle spindles, published by Kucera and Walro using ALD 58 and MF30, and by us using ALD 19 and NN5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1838536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.