Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18384763›Full record

ArticleChemico-biological interactions2008

Inactivation of an invertebrate acetylcholinesterase by sulfhydryl reagents: a reconsideration of the implications for insecticide design.

M Rowland, I Tsigelny, M Wolfe, L Pezzementi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemico-biological interactions, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M RowlandDepartment of Biology, Birmingham-Southern College, Birmingham, AL 35254, USA.
I Tsigelny
M Wolfe
L Pezzementi
Birmingham–Southern College · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Acetylcholinesterase: A Comparative Biochemical ApproachR15GM072510 · NIGMS · BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE · PI PEZZEMENTI, LEO · 2005 to 2005
$201k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15 GM 072510-01NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM072510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously we used site-directed mutagenesis, in vitro expression, and molecular modeling to investigate the inactivation of an invertebrate acetylcholinesterase, cholinesterase 2 from amphioxus, by the sulfhydryl reagents 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) and N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). We created the mutants C310A, C466A, C310A/C466A and C310A/F312I to assess the roles of the two cysteines and a proposal that the increased rate of inactivation previously found in an F312I mutant was due to increased access of sulfhydryl reagents to Cys310. Our results indicated that both of the cysteines could be involved in inactivation by sulfhydryl reagents, but that the cysteine near the acyl pocket was more accessible. We speculated that the inactivation of aphid AChEs by sulfhydryl reagents was due to the presence of a cysteine homologous to Cys310 and proposed that this residue could be a target for a specific insecticide. Here we reconsider this proposal.

Indexed as

AcetylcholinesteraseAnimalsCholinesterase InhibitorsDrug DesignHumansInsecticidesInvertebratesSulfhydryl ReagentsAcetylcholinesteraseCholinesterase InhibitorsInsecticidesSulfhydryl Reagents

Identifiers

PMID18384763
PMCPMC2571039
OpenAlexW1999853694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.