ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2006
Prenatal Screening for HIV in Nova Scotia: Survey of Postpartum Women and Audit of Current Prenatal Screening Practices.
Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines for screening for HIV infections in Nova Scotia recommend an opt-in approach in which patients are counselled and consent to testing. The objectives of the present study were to measure adherence to these recommendations, to explore women's knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours concerning HIV screening, and to compare these results with prenatal screening practices for rubella, hepatitis B and group B streptococcus.
methodsAll women who gave birth consecutively during a seven-week period were recruited. Study participants were interviewed to determine their knowledge, attitudes and beliefs concerning prenatal screening. Hospital and laboratory records were reviewed for information concerning prenatal screening and perinatal treatment to audit screening practices.
resultsA total of 279 patients were enrolled in the study, representing 58% of those eligible. The HIV screening rate was 72%, compared with 95% for rubella, 89% for hepatitis B and 24% for group B streptococcus. Of the participants tested for HIV, 80% were aware of being tested. Of all the study participants, 17% indicated having received pretest counselling about HIV, 56% volunteered to be tested for HIV, 78% received the test results, and 3.8% received post-test counselling. More participants preferred an opt-out approach to HIV screening (50%), where testing is routinely performed on everyone, rather than the opt-in approach (43%). Participants displayed a similar preference for screening for the other infections.
interpretationHIV prenatal testing rates in Nova Scotia are comparable with those of other provinces that recommend an opt-in approach, but are lower than testing rates for opt-out programs. Most study participants were not screened using the recommended opt-in approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.