Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18381818›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila.

Steffen Beisswanger, Wolfgang Stephan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The genetic basis for PRC1 complex diversity emerged early in animal evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  8. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. A survey of methods and tools to detect recent and strong positive selection.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steffen BeisswangerSection of Evolutionary Biology, BioCenter, University of Munich, Grosshaderner Strasse 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany. beisswanger@lmu.de
Wolfgang Stephan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The polyhomeotic (ph) locus in Drosophila melanogaster consists of the two tandemly duplicated genes ph-d (distal) and ph-p (proximal). They code for transcriptional repressors belonging to the Polycomb group proteins, which regulate homeotic genes and hundreds of other loci. Although the duplication of ph occurred at least 25 million to 30 million years ago, both copies are very similar to each other at both the DNA and the protein levels, probably because of the action of frequent gene conversion. Despite this homogenizing force, differential regulation of both transcriptional units suggests that the functions of the duplicates have begun to diverge. Here, we provide evidence that this functional divergence is driven by positive selection. Based on resequencing of an approximately 30-kb region around the ph locus in an African sample of D. melanogaster X chromosomes, we identified a selective sweep, estimated its age and the strength of selection, and mapped the target of selection to a narrow interval of the ph-p gene. This noncoding region contains a large intron with several regulatory elements that are absent in the ph-d duplicate. Our results suggest that neofunctionalization has been achieved in the Drosophila ph genes through the action of strong positive selection and the inactivation of gene conversion in part of the gene.

Indexed as

Genes, DuplicateSelection, GeneticAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene ConversionGenes, InsectNucleoproteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Repressor ProteinsX ChromosomeDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsNucleoproteinsph-d protein, DrosophilaPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Repressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18381818
PMCPMC2291077
OpenAlexW2088845481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.