Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18379855›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2008

Coronary surgery for acute coronary syndrome: which determinants of outcome remain?

K Alexiou, U Kappert, A Staroske, D Joskowiak, M Wilbring, K Matschke, S M Tugtekin

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patient's Perception of Stressors Associated with Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three vessel lesions: patients should undergo PCI!Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2010
    Article
  6. Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three-vessel lesions. Patients should be operated!Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2010
    Article
  7. Apoptosis during CABG surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass is prominent in ventricular but not in atrial myocardium.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. EUROSCORE: still gold standard or less?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K AlexiouDept of Cardiac Surgery, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany. k_alexiou@yahoo.de
U Kappert
A Staroske
D Joskowiak
M Wilbring
K Matschke
S M Tugtekin
TU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mortality risk associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction remains controversial. The objective of the present study was therefore to analyze the outcome and predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients (pts) referred to CABG with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween January 2003 and May 2005, a total of 3,127 pts underwent primary isolated CABG at our institution, including 220 pts with ACS. Out of these, unstable angina pectoris was present in 88 pts (group I), 97 pts (group II) had non-ST-elevation infarction, whereas 35 pts (group III) had ST-elevation infarction. Clinical data, in-hospital morbidity and mortality were recorded and studied retrospectively.

resultsOverall in-hospital mortality was 6.4% (n = 14) in the complete cohort, being 2.2% in group I (n = 2), 9.2% in group II (n = 9) and 8.5% (n = 3) in group III (P < 0.05). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses identified age, NYHA, ejection fraction < 45%, catecholamine support, cardiogenic shock, renal disease and the additive EuroSCORE > 10 (P < 0.0001) as significant predictors related to in-hospital mortality. The mean time from the onset of symptoms to revascularization differed significantly between survivors (5.1 +/- 2.7 h) and no survivors (11.4 +/- 3.2 h) (P < 0.0007) in the STEMI group. Preoperative cTnI did not provide any prognostic information.

conclusionCABG in pts with ACS can be performed with good clinical results. The clinical outcome is particular depending on the different groups of ACS. Therefore an individual risk stratification of each pts in ACS is necessary. The time interval of 6 h seems to be crucial as prognostic variable in the STEMI-group.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedCoronary Artery BypassFemaleGermanyHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18379855
OpenAlexW2061358830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.